Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #9137
| From | Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Evaluating a string as C++ Code |
| Date | 2011-08-21 21:50 +0100 |
| Message-Id | <pan.2011.08.21.20.50.00.228000@nowhere.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| References | <c129d820-b60e-4e46-9608-5fb6ff3e6de8@a12g2000vbf.googlegroups.com> <4e4ca8f1$0$27164$a8266bb1@newsreader.readnews.com> <slrnj4viqf.gtj.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> <pan.2011.08.20.18.35.06.947000@nowhere.com> <slrnj52mbd.gtj.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> |
| Organization | Zen Internet |
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 19:15:58 +0000, Jorgen Grahn wrote: >> That depends upon which flavour of eval you're talking about. >> Lisp's "eval" is perfectly safe [...] > > Sorry, I was talking about imperative interpreted languages. Lisp is frequently both of those. It's rare to see purely "functional" Lisp code (i.e. no use of mutable state). Also, Python does have the ability to separate the read and eval, but it's far more work than doing the same thing in Lisp, and you have to learn the AST (Abstract Syntax Tree) structure, which isn't something you'd otherwise learn (OTOH, Lisp's syntax *is* the parse tree). Consequently, hardly anyone actually uses this feature.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Evaluating a string as C++ Code Miro <nickbergeronsemail@gmail.com> - 2011-07-30 09:52 -0700
Re: Evaluating a string as C++ Code jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2011-07-30 17:40 +0000
Re: Evaluating a string as C++ Code Miro <nickbergeronsemail@gmail.com> - 2011-08-06 13:55 -0700
Re: Evaluating a string as C++ Code jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2011-08-07 00:53 +0000
Re: Evaluating a string as C++ Code Carlo Milanesi <carlo.nospam.milanesi@libero.it> - 2011-07-30 20:08 +0200
Re: Evaluating a string as C++ Code James Kanze <james.kanze@gmail.com> - 2011-08-07 10:26 -0700
Re: Evaluating a string as C++ Code Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-08-11 21:33 +0000
Re: Evaluating a string as C++ Code Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2011-07-30 15:33 -0500
Re: Evaluating a string as C++ Code BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-30 14:45 -0700
Re: Evaluating a string as C++ Code jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-12 10:25 +0200
Re: Evaluating a string as C++ Code Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-12 12:07 +0000
Re: Evaluating a string as C++ Code jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-12 14:31 +0200
Re: Evaluating a string as C++ Code Alexei Zakharov <alexeiz@gmail.com> - 2011-08-18 01:53 -0400
Re: Evaluating a string as C++ Code Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-18 06:22 +0000
Re: Evaluating a string as C++ Code Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2011-08-18 12:26 -0500
Re: Evaluating a string as C++ Code Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-18 18:13 +0000
Re: Evaluating a string as C++ Code Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-08-20 14:57 +0000
Re: Evaluating a string as C++ Code Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-08-20 19:35 +0100
Re: Evaluating a string as C++ Code Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-08-21 19:15 +0000
Re: Evaluating a string as C++ Code Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-08-21 21:50 +0100
csiph-web