Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.php > #2185

Re: An overloading question

Message-Id <1532095.qVoOGUtdWV@PointedEars.de>
From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Date 2011-06-15 14:21 +0200
Subject Re: An overloading question
Newsgroups comp.lang.php
References (2 earlier) <it8n87$7rj$1@dont-email.me> <it8ps7$su3$1@dont-email.me> <it8rmh$6is$1@dont-email.me> <it8vca$nt9$2@dont-email.me> <it93k1$dkn$1@dont-email.me>
Followup-To comp.lang.php

Followups directed to: comp.lang.php

Show all headers | View raw


sheldonlg wrote:

> On 6/14/2011 8:45 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> Id you created it properly, then the constructor in B should be calling
>> b::y().
>>
>> I still suggest you have a mistake in your code.
> 
> No, both constructors are there but are empty.
> 
> […] I […] copied the entire files into a test area […].  I then eliminated
> all methods that were not called, eliminated all includes that were no
> longer needed in the classes, and modified the important routines to only
> do the printing and the one calling routine in the class to only call the
> prescribed method […].  So, besides the constructors (which were empty)
> the base class had two methods and the overload class had one (with the
> name as the final method invoked in the base class).  The only typing I
> did was putting print statements in the final invoked methods to identify
> which one was doing the output.
> 
> […] what happened was that the output was from the overloaded method, not
> the base method. […]

   Talk is cheap. Show me the code.
     -- Linus Torvalds (2000-08-25)

<http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#beprecise> ff.


PointedEars
-- 
    realism:    HTML 4.01 Strict
    evangelism: XHTML 1.0 Strict
    madness:    XHTML 1.1 as application/xhtml+xml
                                                    -- Bjoern Hoehrmann

Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

An overloading question sheldonlg <sheldonlg@thevillages.net> - 2011-06-14 12:49 -0400
  Re: An overloading question Denis McMahon <denis.m.f.mcmahon@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 18:32 +0000
    Re: An overloading question sheldonlg <sheldonlg@thevillages.net> - 2011-06-14 18:27 -0400
      Re: An overloading question Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-06-14 19:12 -0400
        Re: An overloading question sheldonlg <sheldonlg@thevillages.net> - 2011-06-14 19:43 -0400
          Re: An overloading question Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-06-14 20:45 -0400
            Re: An overloading question sheldonlg <sheldonlg@thevillages.net> - 2011-06-14 21:58 -0400
              Re: An overloading question Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-06-14 22:08 -0400
              Re: An overloading question Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-06-15 14:21 +0200
              Re: An overloading question sheldonlg <sheldonlg@thevillages.net> - 2011-06-15 12:55 -0400
        Re: An overloading question Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> - 2011-06-15 18:04 +0200
          Re: An overloading question Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2011-06-15 12:53 -0400
      Re: An overloading question Denis McMahon <denis.m.f.mcmahon@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 03:41 +0000
      Re: An overloading question Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> - 2011-06-15 18:02 +0200
  Re: An overloading question Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-06-15 14:01 +0200

csiph-web