Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming

comp.programming

15696 articles, 8181 threads (numbers 150 – 16945) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
About my scalable algorithms and ARM processor architecture.. Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com> 2019-03-06 13:24 -0800
 
Beating Moore’s Law: Scaling Performance for Another Half-Century (1 reply — unroll) Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com> 2019-03-04 11:15 -0800
   → Re: Beating Moore’s Law: Scaling Performance for Another Half-Century Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> 2019-03-06 05:24 -0800
 
Re: C is not a low level language (179 replies — unroll, only first 100 listed — flat view) "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2019-02-24 12:40 +0800
   → Re: C is not a low level language The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2019-02-24 05:16 +0000
     → Re: C is not a low level language "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2019-02-24 13:20 +0800
       → Re: C is not a low level language "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2019-02-24 13:24 +0800
       → Re: C is not a low level language "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2019-02-24 19:45 +0800
       → Re: C is not a low level language Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2019-02-24 13:09 +0000
         → Re: C is not a low level language The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2019-02-24 14:38 +0000
           → Re: C is not a low level language Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2019-02-24 15:18 +0000
             → Re: C is not a low level language "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> 2019-02-24 17:21 +0100
               → Re: C is not a low level language The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2019-02-24 17:43 +0000
                 → Re: C is not a low level language "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> 2019-02-24 20:17 +0100
               → Re: C is not a low level language Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2019-02-24 18:19 +0000
                 → Re: C is not a low level language "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> 2019-02-24 20:02 +0100
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2019-02-24 19:26 +0000
                 → Re: C is not a low level language "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> 2019-02-24 21:36 +0100
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2019-02-24 20:47 +0000
                 → Re: C is not a low level language The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2019-02-24 21:10 +0000
                 → Re: C is not a low level language "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> 2019-02-25 08:25 +0100
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2019-02-25 12:24 +0000
                 → Re: C is not a low level language "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> 2019-02-25 17:04 +0100
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2019-02-25 16:52 +0000
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> 2019-02-24 17:59 -0800
                 → Re: C is not a low level language "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> 2019-02-25 08:46 +0100
                 → Re: C is not a low level language "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> 2019-02-25 09:36 +0100
                 → Re: C is not a low level language "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> 2019-02-25 10:13 +0100
                 → Re: C is not a low level language "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> 2019-02-26 09:56 +0100
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2019-02-25 14:12 +0000
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> 2019-02-25 12:20 +0000
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> 2019-02-25 13:36 -0800
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be> 2019-02-25 10:29 +0200
                 → Re: C is not a low level language "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> 2019-02-25 09:41 +0100
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be> 2019-02-25 10:55 +0200
                 → Re: C is not a low level language "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> 2019-02-25 10:24 +0100
                 → Re: C is not a low level language The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2019-02-24 21:03 +0000
                 → Re: C is not a low level language "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> 2019-02-25 08:58 +0100
                 → Re: C is not a low level language "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> 2019-02-25 09:40 +0100
                 → Re: C is not a low level language "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> 2019-02-25 10:01 +0100
               → Re: C is not a low level language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> 2019-02-24 12:55 -0800
                 → Re: C is not a low level language "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> 2019-02-25 08:31 +0100
             → Re: C is not a low level language The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2019-02-24 17:42 +0000
               → Re: C is not a low level language Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2019-02-24 18:19 +0000
             → Re: C is not a low level language Bill Findlay <findlaybill@blueyonder.co.uk> 2019-02-24 17:56 +0000
               → Re: C is not a low level language Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2019-02-24 18:23 +0000
                 → Re: C is not a low level language The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2019-02-24 20:58 +0000
               → Re: C is not a low level language The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2019-02-24 20:52 +0000
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Bill Findlay <findlaybill@blueyonder.co.uk> 2019-02-25 16:31 +0000
               → Re: C is not a low level language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> 2019-02-25 14:01 -0800
                 → Re: C is not a low level language scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) 2019-02-25 23:04 +0000
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> 2019-02-25 15:53 -0800
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Bill Findlay <findlaybill@blueyonder.co.uk> 2019-02-28 16:07 +0000
               → Re: C is not a low level language Björn Lundin <b.f.lundin@gmail.com> 2019-02-25 20:50 +0100
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Bill Findlay <findlaybill@blueyonder.co.uk> 2019-02-28 16:04 +0000
                 → Re: C is not a low level language "J. P. Gilliver (John)" <G6JPG-255@255soft.uk> 2019-02-28 16:25 +0000
                 → Re: C is not a low level language "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> 2019-02-28 11:56 -0500
                 → Re: C is not a low level language "NY" <me@privacy.net> 2019-02-28 19:45 +0000
               → Re: C is not a low level language Bart <bc@freeuk.com> 2019-02-25 17:55 +0000
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Bill Findlay <findlaybill@blueyonder.co.uk> 2019-02-28 16:03 +0000
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> 2019-02-28 11:25 -0800
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Bart <bc@freeuk.com> 2019-02-28 19:30 +0000
           → Re: C is not a low level language Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> 2019-02-24 20:47 +0000
             → Re: C is not a low level language The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2019-02-24 21:29 +0000
               → Re: C is not a low level language Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> 2019-02-25 20:16 +0000
       → Re: C is not a low level language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> 2019-02-24 12:53 -0800
       → Re: C is not a low level language Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be> 2019-02-25 09:49 +0200
     → Re: C is not a low level language Björn Lundin <b.f.lundin@gmail.com> 2019-02-25 21:07 +0100
       → Re: C is not a low level language Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> 2019-02-25 22:59 +0000
         → Re: C is not a low level language Björn Lundin <b.f.lundin@gmail.com> 2019-02-26 09:57 +0100
           → Re: C is not a low level language Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> 2019-02-26 09:59 +0000
   → Re: C is not a low level language Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> 2019-02-24 19:54 +1300
     → Re: C is not a low level language Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> 2019-02-24 07:56 +0000
       → Re: C is not a low level language Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> 2019-02-24 21:58 +1300
         → Re: C is not a low level language "A. Dumas" <alexandre@dumas.fr.invalid> 2019-02-24 10:57 +0100
         → Re: C is not a low level language Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> 2019-02-24 10:13 +0000
         → Re: C is not a low level language The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2019-02-24 10:47 +0000
           → Re: C is not a low level language "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> 2019-02-24 08:48 -0500
             → Re: C is not a low level language The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2019-02-24 14:42 +0000
             → Re: C is not a low level language Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> 2019-02-25 07:15 +0000
               → Re: C is not a low level language "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> 2019-02-25 09:25 -0500
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> 2019-02-25 15:03 +0000
                 → Re: C is not a low level language "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> 2019-02-25 12:10 -0500
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> 2019-02-25 17:58 +0000
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Axel Berger <Spam@Berger-Odenthal.De> 2019-02-25 17:44 +0100
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be> 2019-02-25 19:18 +0200
             → Re: C is not a low level language Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be> 2019-02-25 10:35 +0200
               → Re: C is not a low level language "J. P. Gilliver (John)" <G6JPG-255@255soft.uk> 2019-02-25 10:44 +0000
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2019-02-25 12:29 +0000
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> 2019-02-25 14:26 +0000
                 → Re: C is not a low level language "NY" <me@privacy.net> 2019-02-25 17:08 +0000
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be> 2019-02-25 20:08 +0200
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> 2019-02-25 18:00 +0000
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> 2019-02-27 22:37 -0800
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> 2019-02-28 02:25 -0800
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Diesel <nobody@haph.org> 2019-03-05 04:29 +0000
               → Re: C is not a low level language Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> 2019-02-25 12:27 +0000
               → Re: C is not a low level language "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> 2019-02-25 09:36 -0500
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> 2019-02-25 15:05 +0000
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be> 2019-02-25 19:20 +0200
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> 2019-02-25 23:02 +0000
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> 2019-02-26 06:52 +0000
                 → Re: C is not a low level language Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be> 2019-02-26 12:41 +0200
 
About my scalable RWLocks that i have invented.. Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com> 2019-03-03 13:00 -0800
 
Linus Torvalds pulls pin, tosses in grenade: x86 won, forget about Arm in server CPUs, says Linux kernel supremo Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com> 2019-03-02 13:19 -0800
 
More about Energy efficiency.. Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com> 2019-02-26 12:27 -0800
 
Scalable method for producer and consumer elimination is already patented Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com> 2019-02-26 12:16 -0800
 
My Scalable Adder for Delphi and Freepascal was updated to version 1.02 Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com> 2019-02-25 10:37 -0800
 
My Scalable Adder for Delphi and Freepascal was updated to version 1.01 Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com> 2019-02-25 07:34 -0800
 
My Scalable Adder for Delphi and Freepascal version 1.0 is here.. Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com> 2019-02-24 16:46 -0800
 
How to avoid race conditions in Parallel programming in most cases.. Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com> 2019-02-24 12:46 -0800
 
My new "invention" that is an enhanced fully scalable algorithm of a scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references is finished and is coming soon.. Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com> 2019-02-23 15:50 -0800
 
More precision, read again.. Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com> 2019-02-23 15:41 -0800
 
A new scalable algorithm of mine is coming.. Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com> 2019-02-23 15:34 -0800
 
My efficient Threadpool engine with priorities that scales very well was,updated to version 3.72 Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com> 2019-02-23 15:28 -0800
 
My following software projects were updated to the newer versions (1 reply — unroll) Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com> 2019-02-22 12:27 -0800
   → My following software projects were updated to the newer versions Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> 2019-02-22 16:47 -0800
 
My following software projects were updated Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com> 2019-02-18 10:26 -0800
 
I have updated my SemaCondvar & SemaMonitor to version 2.1 Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com> 2019-02-17 11:14 -0800
 
Asynchronous timer for Delphi and Freepascal version 1.0 Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com> 2019-02-17 11:05 -0800
 
About Rust programming language.. (1 reply — unroll) Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com> 2019-02-11 13:03 -0800
   → Re: About Rust programming language.. Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> 2019-02-14 05:06 -0800

← Newer ~Page 186 of ~410 (articles 9616–9820) Older →


csiph-web