Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming

comp.programming

15696 articles, 3351 threads (numbers 150 – 16945) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
Questions about UEFI JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> 2016-01-03 09:37 +0700
 
Re: I will refine my proof Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> 2016-01-02 18:37 -0500
 
Re: I will refine my proof Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-01-02 22:26 +0000
 
Re: Reread please abolut Java Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-01-02 22:01 +0000
 
Re: I have affirmed about Java that Mark Carroll <mtbc@bcs.org> 2016-01-02 21:10 +0000
 
Re: My answer about Ada and FreePascal and C++ (8 replies — unroll) Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2015-12-31 18:59 +0000
   → Re: My answer about Ada and FreePascal and C++ JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> 2016-01-01 07:23 +0700
     → Re: My answer about Ada and FreePascal and C++ Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> 2016-01-01 01:07 +0000
       → Re: My answer about Ada and FreePascal and C++ JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> 2016-01-01 18:16 +0700
         → Re: My answer about Ada and FreePascal and C++ Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2016-01-01 14:34 +0000
           → Re: My answer about Ada and FreePascal and C++ JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> 2016-01-02 09:58 +0700
             → Re: My answer about Ada and FreePascal and C++ Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> 2016-01-02 03:23 +0000
               → Re: My answer about Ada and FreePascal and C++ JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> 2016-01-02 21:35 +0700
         → Re: My answer about Ada and FreePascal and C++ Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> 2016-01-01 16:08 +0000
 
Re: You have not understood my points... Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-01-01 14:15 +0000
 
you have not understand my poibts fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> 2015-12-31 15:44 -0800
 
please read again fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> 2015-12-31 14:49 -0800
 
read more fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> 2015-12-31 14:44 -0800
 
two plus two is six fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> 2015-12-31 14:42 -0800
 
Re: Read this also about C++ (3 replies — unroll) Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2015-12-31 20:50 +0000
   → Re: Read this also about C++ Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> 2016-01-01 10:09 +1300
     → Re: Read this also about C++ Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2015-12-31 21:52 +0000
       → Re: Read this also about C++ Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> 2016-01-01 11:38 +1300
 
Re: I am getting crazy with C++ (2 replies — unroll) commodorejohn <commodorejohn@gmail.com> 2015-12-31 13:13 -0800
   → Re: I am getting crazy with C++ "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> 2015-12-31 14:00 -0800
   → Re: I am getting crazy with C++ Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> 2015-12-31 22:30 +0000
 
Re: Because read this Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2015-12-31 20:28 +0000
 
Re: Plead read again, i correct about C++ (7 replies — unroll) Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2015-12-30 20:16 +0000
   → Re: Plead read again, i correct about C++ Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> 2015-12-31 10:10 +1300
     → Re: Plead read again, i correct about C++ Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2015-12-30 13:32 -0800
     → Re: Plead read again, i correct about C++ Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2015-12-30 21:36 +0000
       → Re: Plead read again, i correct about C++ Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> 2015-12-31 10:42 +1300
         → Re: Plead read again, i correct about C++ Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2015-12-30 22:46 +0000
           → Re: Plead read again, i correct about C++ Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> 2016-01-01 08:41 +1300
             → Re: Plead read again, i correct about C++ Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2015-12-31 20:21 +0000
 
Re: About C++... Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2015-12-31 19:21 +0000
 
Re: About C++... Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2015-12-31 19:20 +0000
 
Re: Read again, i correct about C++ Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2015-12-31 18:29 +0000
 
Re: I am getting crazy with C++ Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2015-12-31 18:28 +0000
 
Re: Here is why C++ and C are bad... (19 replies — unroll) Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2015-12-29 20:31 +0000
   → Re: Here is why C++ and C are bad... Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> 2015-12-29 21:20 +0000
   → Re: Here is why C++ and C are bad... David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2015-12-29 23:13 +0100
     → Re: Here is why C++ and C are bad... Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2015-12-29 22:19 +0000
       → Re: Here is why C++ and C are bad... David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2015-12-30 09:56 +0100
         → Re: Here is why C++ and C are bad... Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2015-12-30 13:28 +0000
           → Re: Here is why C++ and C are bad... David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2015-12-30 14:55 +0100
             → Re: Here is why C++ and C are bad... Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2015-12-30 16:32 +0000
               → Re: Here is why C++ and C are bad... David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2015-12-30 18:17 +0100
                 → Re: Here is why C++ and C are bad... Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2015-12-30 20:01 +0000
           → Re: Here is why C++ and C are bad... Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2015-12-30 15:48 +0000
             → Re: Here is why C++ and C are bad... Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2015-12-30 16:35 +0000
               → Re: Here is why C++ and C are bad... David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2015-12-30 18:19 +0100
                 → Re: Here is why C++ and C are bad... Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2015-12-30 17:39 +0000
                 → Re: Here is why C++ and C are bad... Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2015-12-30 20:26 +0000
               → Re: Here is why C++ and C are bad... "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> 2015-12-30 18:32 +0100
               → Re: Here is why C++ and C are bad... Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2015-12-30 19:55 +0000
                 → Re: Here is why C++ and C are bad... Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2015-12-30 20:15 +0000
                 → Re: Here is why C++ and C are bad... Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2015-12-30 22:00 +0000
       → Re: Here is why C++ and C are bad... Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> 2015-12-31 10:16 +1300

← Newer ~Page 206 of ~300 (articles 6120–6182) Older →


csiph-web