Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.embedded
928 articles, 326 threads (numbers 19 – 959) — flat view
| Advanced| Subject | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Re: A new tablet a day spurring new SoC a day (3 replies — unroll) | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> | 2012-08-11 13:52 +0200 |
| → Re: A new tablet a day spurring new SoC a day | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> | 2012-08-11 14:19 +0100 |
| → Re: A new tablet a day spurring new SoC a day | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> | 2012-08-11 15:40 +0200 |
| → Re: A new tablet a day spurring new SoC a day | Torre Starnes <torre.starnes@gmail.org> | 2012-08-11 10:10 -0400 |
| Can a pair of 1394 card communicates with each other when both reside on the same PC? | Cyber Punker <cyberpunkerx@gmail.com> | 2012-07-24 07:42 -0700 |
| alsa / codec driver (1 reply — unroll) | zorroslade <rlimlaw@gmail.com> | 2012-01-20 10:40 -0800 |
| → Re: alsa / codec driver | nobody <diaochengdong@gmail.com> | 2012-07-17 23:13 -0700 |
| Looking for SSL feedback (2 replies — unroll) | Christopher Conlon <chris@yassl.com> | 2012-06-19 16:57 -0600 |
| → Re: Looking for SSL feedback | VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> | 2012-06-20 09:49 -0500 |
| → Re: Looking for SSL feedback | Christopher Conlon <chris@yassl.com> | 2012-06-25 09:48 -0600 |
| Sr. Embedded/Software Engineer for a Fortune 200 company located in Irvine, Ca for a 18 month contract opportunity. (2 replies — unroll) | itsearchpro@gmail.com | 2012-06-18 13:29 -0700 |
| → Re: Sr. Embedded/Software Engineer for a Fortune 200 company located in Irvine, Ca for a 18 month contract opportunity. | "Stonethrower" <digi_64-public[removeme]@yahoo.com> | 2012-06-20 00:17 +0200 |
| → Re: Sr. Embedded/Software Engineer for a Fortune 200 company located in Irvine, Ca for a 18 month contract opportunity. | hamilton <hamilton@nothere.com> | 2012-06-19 17:15 -0600 |
| Press Release - Reliable Software Technologies, Ada-Europe 2012 | dirk@vana.cs.kuleuven.be. (Dirk Craeynest) | 2012-05-28 20:37 +0000 |
| CyaSSL 2.2.0 Released | Chris Conlon <conlon@yassl.com> | 2012-05-23 17:14 -0600 |
| Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? (15 replies — unroll) | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> | 2012-05-19 13:40 +0100 |
| → Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? | Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> | 2012-05-19 19:40 +0300 |
| → Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> | 2012-05-19 18:34 +0100 |
| → Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? | Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> | 2012-05-19 19:44 +0200 |
| → Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> | 2012-05-19 19:57 +0100 |
| → Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? | Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> | 2012-05-19 21:17 +0200 |
| → Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> | 2012-05-20 22:53 +0100 |
| → Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? | Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> | 2012-05-20 14:42 +0000 |
| → Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> | 2012-05-20 16:48 +0200 |
| → Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? | Nix <nix-razor-pit@esperi.org.uk> | 2012-05-20 22:19 +0100 |
| → Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> | 2012-05-20 22:55 +0100 |
| → Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? | Nix <nix-razor-pit@esperi.org.uk> | 2012-05-21 16:24 +0100 |
| → Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> | 2012-05-21 10:44 -0500 |
| → Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> | 2012-05-21 10:51 -0600 |
| → Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> | 2012-05-21 10:51 -0600 |
| → Re: Why does Linux need memory management units and cache? | Foster <frankfoster50@yahoo.com> | 2012-05-21 12:53 -0400 |
| PID Controller | Abhay Upadhye <autotunecontroller@gmail.com> | 2012-05-08 03:15 -0700 |
| ARM now as powerful as Intel chips (7 replies — unroll) | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> | 2012-05-03 20:01 +0100 |
| → Re: ARM now as powerful as Intel chips | OldGoat <oats@farmerbrowns.com> | 2012-05-03 15:30 -0600 |
| → Re: ARM now as powerful as Intel chips | David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> | 2012-05-04 09:05 +0200 |
| → Re: ARM now as powerful as Intel chips | Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> | 2012-05-04 13:20 +0000 |
| → Re: ARM now as powerful as Intel chips | David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> | 2012-05-04 16:09 +0200 |
| → Re: ARM now as powerful as Intel chips | OldGoat <oats@farmerbrowns.com> | 2012-05-04 12:00 -0600 |
| → Re: ARM now as powerful as Intel chips | OldGoat <oats@farmerbrowns.com> | 2012-05-04 11:58 -0600 |
| → Re: ARM now as powerful as Intel chips | Theo Markettos <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> | 2012-05-05 00:45 +0100 |
| Ada-Europe 2012 early registration deadline approaching | dirk@vana.cs.kuleuven.be. (Dirk Craeynest) | 2012-05-02 21:25 +0000 |
| [Stupid Question] How can I boot my ISO/tar/ext2 image created with buildroot? (2 replies — unroll) | Willy <gruppi@willygroup.org> | 2012-04-20 09:28 +0200 |
| → Re: [Stupid Question] How can I boot my ISO/tar/ext2 image created with buildroot? | Scott Wood <scott@buserror.net> | 2012-04-23 00:45 -0500 |
| → Re: [Stupid Question] How can I boot my ISO/tar/ext2 image created with buildroot? | Willy <gruppi@willygroup.org> | 2012-04-24 15:36 +0200 |
| ARM developer community a bunch of wankers (13 replies — unroll) | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> | 2012-04-21 20:45 +0100 |
| → Re: ARM developer community a bunch of wankers | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> | 2012-04-21 22:36 +0200 |
| → Re: ARM developer community a bunch of wankers | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> | 2012-04-21 21:57 +0100 |
| → Re: ARM developer community a bunch of wankers | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> | 2012-04-21 23:02 +0200 |
| → Re: ARM developer community a bunch of wankers | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> | 2012-04-21 23:11 +0200 |
| → Re: ARM developer community a bunch of wankers | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> | 2012-04-21 23:38 +0100 |
| → Re: ARM developer community a bunch of wankers | Scott Wood <scott@buserror.net> | 2012-04-23 00:35 -0500 |
| → Re: ARM developer community a bunch of wankers | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> | 2012-04-21 23:06 +0200 |
| → Re: ARM developer community a bunch of wankers | OldGoat <oats@farmerbrowns.com> | 2012-04-21 16:28 -0600 |
| → Re: ARM developer community a bunch of wankers | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> | 2012-04-22 00:49 +0200 |
| → Re: ARM developer community a bunch of wankers | OldGoat <oats@farmerbrowns.com> | 2012-04-21 23:13 -0600 |
| → Re: ARM developer community a bunch of wankers | Foster <frankfoster50@yahoo.com> | 2012-04-22 09:22 -0400 |
| → Re: ARM developer community a bunch of wankers | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> | 2012-04-22 15:03 +0100 |
| → Re: ARM developer community a bunch of wankers | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> | 2012-04-22 16:24 +0200 |
| Linaro aims to make the plumbing for porting Linux to ARM SoCs work very well (1 reply — unroll) | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> | 2012-04-16 22:57 +0100 |
| → Re: Linaro aims to make the plumbing for porting Linux to ARM SoCs work very well | Foster <frankfoster50@yahoo.com> | 2012-04-16 19:58 -0400 |
| Hello | "Like Learn" <like2learn@live.ca> | 2012-04-13 09:53 -0600 |
| 17th Int.Conf. Reliable Software Technologies, Ada-Europe 2012 | dirk@vana.cs.kuleuven.be. (Dirk Craeynest) | 2012-04-12 21:40 +0000 |
| True geek ports Linux to 8 bit CPU | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> | 2012-03-29 18:05 +0100 |
| Yocto (1 reply — unroll) | "TW Burger" <twburger@gmail.com> | 2012-03-28 11:47 -0700 |
| → Re: Yocto | "TW Burger" <twburger@gmail.com> | 2012-03-28 12:10 -0700 |
| Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? (25 replies — unroll) | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> | 2012-03-22 19:29 +0000 |
| → Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? | unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> | 2012-03-22 20:14 +0000 |
| → Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> | 2012-03-22 20:16 +0000 |
| → Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> | 2012-03-22 21:31 +0100 |
| → Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> | 2012-03-22 20:43 +0000 |
| → Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> | 2012-03-22 21:52 +0100 |
| → Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? | "Henk & Ingrid" <Henk_Ingrid@invalid.invalid> | 2012-03-22 22:56 +0100 |
| → Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? | Foster <frankfoster50@yahoo.com> | 2012-03-22 22:04 -0400 |
| → Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? | unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> | 2012-03-22 21:14 +0000 |
| → Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> | 2012-03-22 22:46 +0000 |
| → Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> | 2012-03-23 16:29 +0100 |
| → Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? | Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> | 2012-03-26 23:43 +0300 |
| → Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? | hamilton <hamilton@nothere.com> | 2012-03-26 16:03 -0600 |
| → Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? | unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> | 2012-03-27 02:38 +0000 |
| → Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> | 2012-03-23 15:39 +0000 |
| → Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> | 2012-03-23 12:55 -0400 |
| → Meet Ezekiel - Burson-Marselar employee trolling Linux Newsgroups | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> | 2012-03-23 17:10 +0000 |
| → Meet Ezekiel - Burson-Marselar employee trolling Linux Newsgroups | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> | 2012-03-23 17:10 +0000 |
| → Re: Meet Ezekiel - Burson-Marselar employee trolling Linux Newsgroups | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> | 2012-03-23 13:15 -0400 |
| → Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? | Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> | 2012-03-22 20:25 +0000 |
| → Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> | 2012-03-23 15:46 +0000 |
| → Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? | David Brown <david.brown@removethis.hesbynett.no> | 2012-03-23 22:27 +0100 |
| → Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> | 2012-03-23 21:42 +0000 |
| → Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> | 2012-03-25 09:08 -0400 |
| → Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> | 2012-03-22 17:18 -0400 |
| → Re: Next year will see 100GB SSD cheap as chips, but why does Linux need to format an SSD? | Greg Hennessy <me@privacy.org> | 2012-03-23 23:02 +1100 |
| Time to ditch CPUs and concentrate on GPUs? (5 replies — unroll) | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> | 2012-03-18 17:43 +0000 |
| → Re: Time to ditch CPUs and concentrate on GPUs? | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> | 2012-03-18 19:03 +0100 |
| → Meet Hadron quack - Burson-Marstelar Employee trolling Linux newsgroups | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> | 2012-03-18 18:19 +0000 |
| → Re: Meet Hadron quack - Burson-Marstelar Employee trolling Linux newsgroups | "Clogwog" <clogwog@anon.eu> | 2012-03-18 20:38 +0100 |
| → Re: Time to ditch CPUs and concentrate on GPUs? | 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> | 2012-03-18 22:47 +0000 |
| → Re: Time to ditch CPUs and concentrate on GPUs? | OldGoat <oats@farmerbrowns.com> | 2012-03-19 00:29 -0600 |
← Newer ~Page 12 of ~17 (articles 202–329) Older →
csiph-web