Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer

comp.lang.java.programmer

49573 articles, 1382 threads (numbers 2534 – 53779) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
End of String Problem: Sending C++ string to java code (7 replies — unroll) clusardi2k@aol.com 2013-10-08 09:56 -0700
   → Re: End of String Problem: Sending C++ string to java code Arivald <NOSPAMarivald@interia.pl> 2013-10-08 20:05 +0200
   → Re: End of String Problem: Sending C++ string to java code Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> 2013-10-08 11:13 -0700
   → Re: End of String Problem: Sending C++ string to java code Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> 2013-10-08 20:30 -0400
     → Re: End of String Problem: Sending C++ string to java code Mark <i@dontgetlotsofspamanymore.invalid> 2013-10-09 15:29 +0100
     → Re: End of String Problem: Sending C++ string to java code "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> 2013-10-09 15:35 +0100
   → Re: End of String Problem: Sending C++ string to java code Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> 2013-10-09 10:50 -0600
     → Re: End of String Problem: Sending C++ string to java code Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> 2013-10-09 11:03 -0600
 
ResourceBundle to load a subsequent file in addition? RVic <rvince99@hotmail.com> 2013-10-09 06:49 -0700
 
Java online Training at Hyderabad, India renuka1717.n@gmail.com 2013-10-07 05:31 -0700
 
StringBuilder.append and CharSequence (19 replies — unroll) Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> 2013-09-25 14:19 +0000
   → Re: StringBuilder.append and CharSequence markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> 2013-09-25 13:02 -0700
     → Re: StringBuilder.append and CharSequence markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> 2013-09-25 18:34 -0700
       → Re: StringBuilder.append and CharSequence Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> 2013-09-26 17:37 +0000
         → Re: StringBuilder.append and CharSequence Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> 2013-09-26 23:11 +0200
           → Re: StringBuilder.append and CharSequence Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> 2013-09-27 13:30 +0000
             → Re: StringBuilder.append and CharSequence Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> 2013-09-27 19:31 +0200
               → Re: StringBuilder.append and CharSequence markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> 2013-09-27 13:45 -0700
                 → Re: StringBuilder.append and CharSequence Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> 2013-09-27 23:16 +0000
                 → Re: StringBuilder.append and CharSequence Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> 2013-09-29 04:58 +0200
                 → Re: StringBuilder.append and CharSequence Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> 2013-09-30 20:02 +0000
   → Re: StringBuilder.append and CharSequence Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-09-25 20:57 -0400
     → Re: StringBuilder.append and CharSequence Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> 2013-09-26 18:01 +0000
       → Re: StringBuilder.append and CharSequence Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-09-26 15:47 -0400
         → Re: StringBuilder.append and CharSequence Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> 2013-09-26 20:48 +0000
           → Re: StringBuilder.append and CharSequence Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-09-26 16:58 -0400
             → Re: StringBuilder.append and CharSequence Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> 2013-09-27 12:52 +0000
               → Re: StringBuilder.append and CharSequence Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-10-04 20:59 -0400
                 → Re: StringBuilder.append and CharSequence Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> 2013-10-05 12:51 +0000
   → Re: StringBuilder.append and CharSequence Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-09-27 15:41 +0300
 
Redirect - HTML PHP Javascript prahlad singh raghuvanshi <softpsr@gmail.com> 2013-10-05 03:25 -0700
 
boolean and thread safety (1 reply — unroll) "raphfrk@gmail.com" <raphfrk@gmail.com> 2011-02-11 10:09 -0800
   → Re: boolean and thread safety markspace <nospam@nowhere.com> 2011-02-11 11:00 -0800
 
JLS 3/e -- Lots Of Errors Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-04 14:49 +1300
 
Object's properties changed (1 reply — unroll) Vasu <vasudevmukherjee@yahoo.co.uk> 2011-02-11 21:55 -0800
   → Re: Object's properties changed Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> 2011-02-12 15:01 +0800
 
limitations on using enum as generic parameter (7 replies — unroll) "dalamb@cs.queensu.ca" <david.alex.lamb@gmail.com> 2011-02-08 09:50 -0800
   → Re: limitations on using enum as generic parameter Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> 2011-02-11 07:36 -0500
   → Re: limitations on using enum as generic parameter Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte.net.invalid> 2011-02-08 20:36 +0100
   → Re: limitations on using enum as generic parameter Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> 2011-02-08 19:46 +0100
   → Re: limitations on using enum as generic parameter Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> 2011-02-10 22:50 -0800
   → Re: limitations on using enum as generic parameter Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> 2011-02-10 22:47 -0800
   → Re: limitations on using enum as generic parameter markspace <nospam@nowhere.com> 2011-02-08 10:34 -0800
     → Re: limitations on using enum as generic parameter Lew <lew@lewscanon.com> 2011-02-08 10:38 -0800
 
Why “new”? (13 replies — unroll) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-05 13:53 +1300
   → Re: Why ?new?? Owen Jacobson <angrybaldguy@gmail.com> 2011-02-05 10:46 -0500
   → Re: Why “new”? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-05 19:29 +1300
     → Re: Why “new”? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> 2011-02-05 09:22 -0500
     → Re: Why “new”? Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> 2011-02-05 10:41 -0500
   → Re: Why “new”? Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> 2011-02-04 23:43 -0500
     → Re: Why “new”? Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> 2011-02-05 09:31 -0400
   → Re: Why “new”? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte.net.invalid> 2011-02-05 18:43 +0100
   → Re: Why “new”? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-04 20:05 -0500
     → Re: Why “new”? "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> 2011-02-04 17:33 -0800
       → Re: Why “new”? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-05 14:53 +1300
     → Re: Why “new”? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-05 14:24 +1300
   → Re: Why “new”? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> 2011-02-04 23:47 -0500
   → Re: Why “new”? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte.net.invalid> 2011-02-05 02:09 +0100
 
Re: JLS 3/e -- Lots Of Errors (7 replies — unroll) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> 2011-02-05 09:43 -0500
   → Re: JLS 3/e -- Lots Of Errors Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-07 15:48 +1300
     → Re: JLS 3/e -- Lots Of Errors Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> 2011-02-06 22:00 -0500
       → Re: JLS 3/e -- Lots Of Errors Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-07 19:12 +1300
   → Re: JLS 3/e -- Lots Of Errors Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> 2011-02-06 20:49 -0500
   → Re: JLS 3/e -- Lots Of Errors Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-06 21:00 -0500
   → Re: JLS 3/e -- Lots Of Errors Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-06 21:02 -0500
   → Re: JLS 3/e -- Lots Of Errors Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-07 14:32 +1300
 
Re: deleting files (3 replies — unroll) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> 2011-01-29 08:44 -0500
   → Re: deleting files Luuk <Luuk@invalid.lan> 2011-01-29 15:45 +0100
     → Re: deleting files "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> 2011-01-29 10:07 -0800
     → Re: deleting files Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> 2011-01-29 10:40 -0500
 
Re: Java vs C++ (43 replies — unroll) Silvio <silvio@moc.com> 2011-02-05 18:04 +0100
   → Re: Java vs C++ Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> 2011-02-07 16:21 +0800
   → Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-07 12:28 +1300
   → Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-08 09:22 +1300
     → Re: Java vs C++ Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> 2011-02-07 17:25 -0500
       → Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-08 16:08 +1300
   → Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-07 12:24 +1300
     → Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-07 15:03 +1300
       → Re: Java vs C++ Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> 2011-02-06 21:18 -0500
       → Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-06 21:26 -0500
     → Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-06 20:15 -0500
   → Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-07 15:55 +1300
   → Re: Java vs C++ "javax.swing.JSnarker" <gharriman@boojum.mit.edu> 2011-02-06 19:54 -0500
   → Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-06 20:50 -0500
   → Re: Java vs C++ Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> 2011-02-07 15:54 +0800
   → Re: Java vs C++ Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> 2011-02-07 01:04 +0100
     → Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-06 20:26 -0500
       → Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-07 19:09 +1300
         → Re: Java vs C++ Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> 2011-02-07 07:29 -0500
         → Re: Java vs C++ "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> 2011-02-06 22:52 -0800
     → Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-07 13:32 +1300
   → Re: Java vs C++ Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> 2011-02-06 16:35 +0100
     → Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-07 15:51 +1300
       → Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-06 22:06 -0500
     → Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-07 15:01 +1300
       → Re: Java vs C++ Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> 2011-02-07 14:53 +0100
     → Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-07 19:52 -0500
     → Re: Java vs C++ Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> 2011-02-06 13:09 -0500
       → Re: Java vs C++ Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> 2011-02-07 00:55 +0100
     → Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-07 15:00 +1300
       → Re: Java vs C++ Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> 2011-02-06 21:20 -0500
         → Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-07 15:52 +1300
       → Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-06 21:25 -0500
     → Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-06 20:29 -0500
     → Re: Java vs C++ Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> 2011-02-07 00:57 +0100
     → Re: Java vs C++ Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> 2011-02-06 12:57 -0500
     → Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-06 15:22 -0500
     → Re: Java vs C++ "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> 2011-02-06 08:11 -0800
     → Re: Java vs C++ Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> 2011-02-07 04:41 +0100
   → Re: Java vs C++ Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> 2011-02-06 21:12 -0500
   → Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-07 12:26 +1300
   → Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-06 15:27 -0500
   → Re: Java vs C++ Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> 2011-02-06 16:45 +0100
   → Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-06 20:51 -0500
 
Re: The easiest framework for Java Database applications development released for production use (6 replies — unroll) Wojtek <nowhere@a.com> 2011-02-07 20:51 -0800
   → Re: The easiest framework for Java Database applications development released for production use Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> 2011-02-08 20:01 -0400
   → Re: The easiest framework for Java Database applications development released for production use Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-08 19:08 -0500
   → Re: The easiest framework for Java Database applications development released for production use Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> 2011-02-09 07:55 -0500
   → Re: The easiest framework for Java Database applications development released for production use yaormaAdmin <yaorma@gmail.com> 2011-02-08 05:44 -0800
   → Re: The easiest framework for Java Database applications development released for production use Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-08 19:06 -0500
     → Re: The easiest framework for Java Database applications development released for production use Wojtek <nowhere@a.com> 2011-02-08 21:59 -0800
 
Why No Supplemental Characters In Character Literals? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-04 18:59 +1300
 
Java vs C++ (45 replies — unroll) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-06 00:15 +1300
   → Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-07 14:55 +1300
     → Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-06 21:15 -0500
       → Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> 2011-02-09 15:48 +1100
         → Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> 2011-02-09 00:15 -0500
       → Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-07 22:13 -0500
         → Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-11 13:11 +1300
       → Re: Java vs C++ Tim Slattery <Slattery_T@bls.gov> 2011-02-08 09:00 -0500
       → Re: Java vs C++ Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> 2011-02-08 14:13 +1100
         → Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-08 20:31 +1300
         → Re: [OT] Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> 2011-02-08 16:53 +1100
           → Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-08 20:32 +1300
         → [OT] Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> 2011-02-07 23:19 -0500
       → Re: Java vs C++ Silvio <silvio@moc.com> 2011-02-07 18:58 +0100
         → Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-07 19:59 -0500
         → Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-08 15:59 +1300
       → Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-07 22:09 -0500
       → Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-08 15:57 +1300
   → Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-08 16:00 +1300
     → Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-07 22:07 -0500
   → Re: Java vs C++ Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> 2011-02-06 21:22 -0500
   → Re: Java vs C++ Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> 2011-02-05 09:26 -0500
   → Re: Java vs C++ Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> 2011-02-06 14:30 -0500
   → Re: Java vs C++ Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> 2011-02-06 20:42 -0500
     → Re: Java vs C++ "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> 2011-02-07 21:03 -0800
     → Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-07 14:51 +1300
     → Re: Java vs C++ Wojtek <nowhere@a.com> 2011-02-07 20:43 -0800
   → Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-07 12:54 +1300
     → Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-06 21:08 -0500
       → Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-07 15:10 +1300
     → Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-06 19:57 -0500
       → Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-07 14:51 +1300
   → Re: Java vs C++ Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> 2011-02-05 09:24 -0500
   → Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-06 09:28 -0500
     → Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-06 15:20 -0500
     → Re: Java vs C++ Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> 2011-02-06 10:55 -0800
   → Re: Java vs C++ Pitch <mail@fake.info> 2011-02-05 13:01 +0100
     → Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-06 01:24 +1300
   → Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-05 09:38 -0500
   → Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-05 09:32 -0500
   → Re: Java vs C++ Jef <e70838@gmail.com> 2011-02-09 04:34 -0800
   → Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-06 21:12 -0500
   → Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-07 14:53 +1300
   → Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-06 09:30 -0500
   → Re: Java vs C++ Silvio <silvio@moc.com> 2011-02-05 15:02 +0100
   → Re: Java vs C++ Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> 2011-02-05 10:49 -0500
 
Dependency resolution in Java builds (12 replies — unroll) Markus Gessner <nospam@nospam.com> 2011-02-08 23:26 +0100
   → Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-02-09 14:52 -0800
   → Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-09 19:39 -0500
   → Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> 2011-02-10 14:59 -0700
   → Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Markus Gessner <nospam@nospam.com> 2011-02-09 08:18 +0100
     → Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> 2011-02-09 18:43 -0500
       → Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-02-09 15:50 -0800
     → Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> 2011-02-09 08:11 -0500
       → Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-02-09 15:03 -0800
   → Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> 2011-02-09 20:51 -0800
   → Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-08 21:03 -0500
   → Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> 2011-02-09 23:26 +0000
   → Re: Dependency resolution in Java builds markspace <nospam@nowhere.com> 2011-02-08 18:10 -0800
 
Re: Why No Supplemental Characters In Character Literals? (9 replies — unroll) Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-04 22:30 -0500
   → Re: Why No Supplemental Characters In Character Literals? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> 2011-02-07 19:16 -0500
   → Re: Why No Supplemental Characters In Character Literals? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-07 18:26 -0500
   → Re: Why No Supplemental Characters In Character Literals? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> 2011-02-06 11:15 -0500
     → Re: Why No Supplemental Characters In Character Literals? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> 2011-02-07 04:15 +0100
       → Re: Why No Supplemental Characters In Character Literals? "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> 2011-02-06 20:53 -0800
   → Re: Why No Supplemental Characters In Character Literals? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> 2011-02-05 07:15 +0100
     → Re: Why No Supplemental Characters In Character Literals? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2011-02-06 09:25 -0500
   → Re: Why No Supplemental Characters In Character Literals? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> 2011-02-05 04:48 +0100
     → Re: Why No Supplemental Characters In Character Literals? "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> 2011-02-04 21:46 -0800
 
Re: JLS 3/e -- Lots Of Errors Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> 2011-02-07 15:44 +1300

← Newer ~Page 199 of ~358 (articles 26215–26275) Older →


csiph-web