Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer

comp.lang.java.programmer

49573 articles, 1382 threads (numbers 2534 – 53779) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 (85 replies — unroll) Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> 2013-04-16 15:48 -0700
   → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> 2013-04-16 16:48 -0700
   → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-20 13:00 +0300
   → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> 2013-04-20 15:13 +0200
     → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-20 19:07 +0300
       → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> 2013-04-20 09:24 -0700
         → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-20 19:34 +0300
           → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> 2013-04-20 11:01 -0700
             → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-21 00:25 +0300
           → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> 2013-04-20 22:03 +0200
             → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-21 00:29 +0300
               → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> 2013-04-20 21:56 +0000
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-21 08:31 +0300
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> 2013-04-21 11:08 +0000
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> 2013-04-21 13:43 -0300
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-21 23:12 +0300
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> 2013-04-21 21:17 +0000
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-27 22:49 -0400
               → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> 2013-04-20 15:03 -0700
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-21 08:26 +0300
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> 2013-04-21 14:30 +0100
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> 2013-04-21 09:20 -0700
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> 2013-04-21 11:31 -0700
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> 2013-04-21 16:06 -0300
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> 2013-04-21 19:47 +0000
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> 2013-04-21 23:01 +0000
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-21 23:29 +0300
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-21 23:45 +0300
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> 2013-04-21 21:38 +0000
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> 2013-04-21 18:49 -0700
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-22 09:36 +0300
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> 2013-04-22 10:39 +0100
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> 2013-04-22 07:43 -0700
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-22 19:33 +0300
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> 2013-04-23 07:30 +0100
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> 2013-04-22 21:07 +0000
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-23 23:28 +0300
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> 2013-04-23 21:05 +0000
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-24 11:22 +0300
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> 2013-04-24 20:22 +0000
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Nigel Wade <nmw@ion.le.ac.uk> 2013-04-24 11:24 +0100
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-21 23:23 +0300
             → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-21 00:40 +0300
               → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> 2013-04-23 10:48 +0100
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Donkey Hottie <donkey@fredriksson.dy.fi> 2013-04-23 13:31 +0300
                 → <? extends String> (was: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21) Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> 2013-04-23 14:55 +0100
                 → Re: <? extends String> lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> 2013-04-23 16:37 +0100
                 → Re: <? extends String> Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> 2013-04-23 08:50 -0700
                 → Re: <? extends String> lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> 2013-04-23 17:30 +0100
                 → Re: <? extends String> Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> 2013-04-23 09:58 -0700
                 → Re: <? extends String> Donkey Hottie <donkey@fredriksson.dy.fi> 2013-04-23 21:06 +0300
                 → Re: <? extends String> lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> 2013-04-23 19:33 +0100
                 → Re: <? extends String> Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> 2013-04-23 12:26 -0700
                 → Re: <? extends String> lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> 2013-04-24 09:08 +0100
                 → Re: <? extends String> Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> 2013-04-23 16:28 -0300
                 → Re: <? extends String> (was: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21) Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> 2013-04-23 14:12 -0700
                 → Re: <? extends String> Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> 2013-04-23 23:22 +0100
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> 2013-04-23 19:56 +0100
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-23 23:31 +0300
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> 2013-04-23 23:39 +0100
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-24 09:29 +0300
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> 2013-04-24 10:26 +0100
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-24 13:11 +0300
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> 2013-04-24 22:24 +0100
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-25 11:49 +0300
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> 2013-04-25 10:19 +0100
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> 2013-04-25 09:02 +0100
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-25 11:47 +0300
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> 2013-04-25 09:50 +0100
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> 2013-04-25 10:07 +0100
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> 2013-04-27 08:44 +0100
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-26 20:17 +0300
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> 2013-04-27 09:22 +0100
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-27 12:39 +0300
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-23 23:17 +0300
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> 2013-04-23 17:32 -0300
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-24 10:39 +0300
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> 2013-04-25 09:02 +0100
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-25 11:59 +0300
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> 2013-04-25 18:38 -0300
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-28 10:57 +0300
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-27 22:35 -0400
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> 2013-04-28 09:23 +0300
                 → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-28 09:52 -0400
   → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> 2013-04-20 17:52 +0300
     → Re: exec problem is JDK 1.7.0_21 Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-27 22:31 -0400
 
> Sandboxed power == More secure??? (25 replies — unroll) Richard Maher <maher_rjSPAMLESS@hotmail.com> 2013-04-17 07:45 +0800
   → Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-16 22:12 -0400
     → Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> 2013-04-16 19:25 -0700
       → Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-16 22:30 -0400
     → Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> 2013-04-17 09:14 -0700
       → Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> 2013-04-17 13:09 -0400
         → Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> 2013-04-17 11:37 -0700
           → Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> 2013-04-17 15:49 -0400
             → Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-17 19:10 -0400
             → Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-17 19:13 -0400
               → Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> 2013-04-17 21:12 -0400
                 → Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-17 21:34 -0400
                 → Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-17 21:39 -0400
       → Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-17 19:06 -0400
         → Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> 2013-04-18 03:04 +0200
   → Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> 2013-04-17 10:37 -0700
     → Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? paul.cager@gmail.com 2013-04-17 10:54 -0700
     → Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-17 19:02 -0400
       → Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Richard Maher <maher_rjSPAMLESS@hotmail.com> 2013-04-25 10:09 +0800
         → Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-24 22:30 -0400
         → Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> 2013-04-25 08:54 -0700
           → Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-26 22:11 -0400
             → Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> 2013-04-26 20:05 -0700
               → Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-27 22:23 -0400
               → Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> 2013-04-28 12:09 +0100
                 → Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-28 09:43 -0400
 
Re: A small exercise Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> 2013-04-27 15:40 +0200
 
Google down? (18 replies — unroll) Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> 2013-04-22 15:35 -0700
   → Re: Google down? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> 2013-04-22 16:16 -0700
     → Re: Google down? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> 2013-04-22 16:25 -0700
       → Re: Google down? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> 2013-04-22 17:39 -0700
         → Re: Google down? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> 2013-04-22 18:07 -0700
           → Re: Google down? lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> 2013-04-23 08:42 +0100
             → Re: Google down? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-23 22:23 -0400
               → Re: Google down? lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> 2013-04-24 08:44 +0100
                 → Re: Google down? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-26 22:20 -0400
         → Re: Google down? Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> 2013-04-22 20:22 -0500
           → Re: Google down? x@x.com (znôrt) 2013-04-23 08:11 +0200
             → Re: Google down? Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> 2013-04-23 09:34 -0500
               → Re: Google down? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-23 22:21 -0400
           → Re: Google down? Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> 2013-04-23 12:07 -0700
         → Re: Google down? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-22 21:38 -0400
           → Re: Google down? Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> 2013-04-23 14:37 +0200
             → Re: Google down? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-23 22:27 -0400
   → Re: Google down? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-22 19:36 -0400
   → Re: Google down? rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> 2013-04-24 12:03 +0100
 
Direct client//New Excellent Job Opportunity for a Developer @ Atlanta, GA (3 replies — unroll) Aftaab Pathan <sunrecusa@gmail.com> 2013-04-25 15:34 -0700
   → Re: Direct client//New Excellent Job Opportunity for a Developer @ Atlanta, GA Wojtek <nowhere@a.com> 2013-04-25 15:49 -0700
   → Re: Direct client//New Excellent Job Opportunity for a Developer @ Atlanta, GA Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> 2013-04-25 16:29 -0700
     → Re: Direct client//New Excellent Job Opportunity for a Developer @ Atlanta, GA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-26 22:07 -0400
 
Considering File Content: Will the NetBeans IDE (deployed version) produce files identical to the javac compiler files (4 replies — unroll) clusardi2k@aol.com 2013-04-26 06:41 -0700
   → Re: Considering File Content: Will the NetBeans IDE (deployed version) produce files identical to the javac compiler files markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> 2013-04-26 08:56 -0700
   → Re: Considering File Content: Will the NetBeans IDE (deployed version) produce files identical to the javac compiler files Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> 2013-04-26 14:08 -0400
   → Re: Considering File Content: Will the NetBeans IDE (deployed version) produce files identical to the javac compiler files Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> 2013-04-26 13:11 -0700
   → Re: Considering File Content: Will the NetBeans IDE (deployed version) produce files identical to the javac compiler files Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-26 16:37 -0400
 
Scrolling invisible scroll bar Wojtek <nowhere@a.com> 2013-04-25 11:24 -0700
 
Epic Quest / Tech Job Fair – May 2013 JAGATHA MUTHUSWAMI <corp.corp11@gmail.com> 2013-04-25 04:04 -0700
 
Best Dropbox alternative with 10GB Free space!!! akanakshaa@gmail.com 2013-04-25 02:56 -0700
 
FireFox Bug 856969 -Too much recursion error with Java LiveConnect Applet (6 replies — unroll) Richard Maher <maher_rjSPAMLESS@hotmail.com> 2013-04-02 20:44 +0800
   → Re: FireFox Bug 856969 -Too much recursion error with Java LiveConnect Applet Richard Maher <maher_rjSPAMLESS@hotmail.com> 2013-04-16 17:47 +0800
     → Re: FireFox Bug 856969 -Too much recursion error with Java LiveConnect Applet Silvio <silvio@internet.com> 2013-04-16 13:01 +0200
       → Re: FireFox Bug 856969 -Too much recursion error with Java LiveConnect Applet Richard Maher <maher_rjSPAMLESS@hotmail.com> 2013-04-21 14:44 +0800
         → Re: FireFox Bug 856969 -Too much recursion error with Java LiveConnect Applet "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> 2013-04-21 20:17 +1000
           → Re: FireFox Bug 856969 -Too much recursion error with Java LiveConnect Applet Richard Maher <maher_rjSPAMLESS@hotmail.com> 2013-04-25 10:20 +0800
             → Re: FireFox Bug 856969 -Too much recursion error with Java LiveConnect Applet "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> 2013-04-25 15:14 +1000
 
Re: DI/wiring (8 replies — unroll) Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> 2013-04-18 09:32 -0700
   → Re: DI/wiring Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> 2013-04-23 23:32 -0700
   → Re: DI/wiring Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> 2013-04-24 09:44 +0200
   → Re: DI/wiring Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> 2013-04-24 09:19 -0300
   → Re: DI/wiring Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> 2013-04-24 08:40 -0700
     → Re: DI/wiring Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> 2013-04-24 13:05 -0300
     → Re: DI/wiring Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> 2013-04-24 21:14 +0200
   → Re: DI/wiring Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> 2013-04-24 20:13 +0200
     → Re: DI/wiring markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> 2013-04-24 14:22 -0700
 
Re: DI/wiring (4 replies — unroll) markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> 2013-04-18 12:16 -0700
   → Re: DI/wiring Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> 2013-04-22 09:03 +0200
     → Re: DI/wiring markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> 2013-04-22 10:59 -0700
       → Re: DI/wiring Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> 2013-04-24 06:37 +0200
       → Re: DI/wiring Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> 2013-04-24 10:28 -0300
 
Eclipse-3.7.2, findbugs-2.0.2, JDK-1.7.0_xx? (2 replies — unroll) v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) 2013-04-10 12:16 +0000
   → Re: Eclipse-3.7.2, findbugs-2.0.2, JDK-1.7.0_xx? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-10 19:46 -0400
     → Re: Eclipse-3.7.2, findbugs-2.0.2, JDK-1.7.0_xx? v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) 2013-04-23 23:46 +0000
 
Dear Human !!!!!!!!!!!!!! BV BV <bv8bv8bv8@gmail.com> 2013-04-20 12:12 -0700
 
5th col dies, cols 6 thru 15 move 1 col left, 15th col is born (8 replies — unroll) clusardi2k@aol.com 2013-04-19 16:54 -0700
   → Re: 5th col dies, cols 6 thru 15 move 1 col left, 15th col is born Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> 2013-04-19 17:03 -0700
     → Re: 5th col dies, cols 6 thru 15 move 1 col left, 15th col is born "clusa@aol.com" <clusardi2k@aol.com> 2013-04-19 17:29 -0700
     → Re: 5th col dies, cols 6 thru 15 move 1 col left, 15th col is born "clusa@aol.com" <clusardi2k@aol.com> 2013-04-19 22:29 -0700
       → Re: 5th col dies, cols 6 thru 15 move 1 col left, 15th col is born Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> 2013-04-20 09:02 -0700
   → [OT] Re: 5th col dies, cols 6 thru 15 move 1 col left, 15th col is born Manuel Collado <m.collado@domain.invalid> 2013-04-20 16:44 +0200
   → Re: 5th col dies, cols 6 thru 15 move 1 col left, 15th col is born Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> 2013-04-20 11:17 -0400
     → Re: 5th col dies, cols 6 thru 15 move 1 col left, 15th col is born "clusa@aol.com" <clusardi2k@aol.com> 2013-04-20 09:02 -0700
       → Re: 5th col dies, cols 6 thru 15 move 1 col left, 15th col is born Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> 2013-04-20 14:14 -0400
 
CRF in Java (1 reply — unroll) Subhabrata <subhabangalore@gmail.com> 2013-04-18 12:57 -0700
   → Re: CRF in Java Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> 2013-04-20 10:04 -0700
 
Re: A small exercise (1 reply — unroll) Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-20 09:28 -0400
   → Re: A small exercise Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> 2013-04-20 10:02 -0700
 
JAXB Object (not strongly typed) within class creating MarshalException (1 reply — unroll) Greg <shireyg@gmail.com> 2013-04-16 08:22 -0700
   → Re: JAXB Object (not strongly typed) within class creating MarshalException Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> 2013-04-19 20:37 +0200
 
Yet another bug in 1.7.0_21 (4 replies — unroll) Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> 2013-04-16 17:02 -0700
   → Re: Yet another bug in 1.7.0_21 Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> 2013-04-16 17:27 -0700
     → Re: Yet another bug in 1.7.0_21 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> 2013-04-16 19:26 -0700
       → Re: Yet another bug in 1.7.0_21 Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> 2013-04-18 13:01 -0700
   → Re: Yet another bug in 1.7.0_21 Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-16 22:31 -0400
 
which is best java library for socket programming (4 replies — unroll) DeepakS <deepak.pucsd@gmail.com> 2013-04-17 13:43 -0700
   → Re: which is best java library for socket programming markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> 2013-04-17 14:07 -0700
     → Re: which is best java library for socket programming Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> 2013-04-17 14:18 -0700
   → Re: which is best java library for socket programming Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> 2013-04-17 18:59 -0400
   → Re: which is best java library for socket programming Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> 2013-04-18 12:54 -0700

← Newer ~Page 217 of ~358 (articles 23510–23698) Older →


csiph-web