Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c++

comp.lang.c++

120580 articles (numbers 2784 – 125745) — threaded view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date [asc]
memory_order_consume... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2025-10-10 00:08 -0700
Claude AI found a key ambiguity in the words that professor Sipser agreed to olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-10-10 12:39 -0500
Re: memory_order_consume... Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> 2025-10-11 21:15 +0200
Re: memory_order_consume... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2025-10-11 13:09 -0700
That HHH(DD) rejects its input as non-halting semantically logically entailed olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-10-11 15:33 -0500
Updated input to LLM systems proving HHH(DD)==0 within assumptions olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-10-12 08:50 -0500
Re: The halting problem proof question is incorrect --- Outside the domain olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-10-13 08:29 -0500
Re: Updated input to LLM systems proving HHH(DD)==0 within assumptions olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-10-13 11:26 -0500
Re: ChatGPT seems to understand that HHH(DD) is correct and not contradicted by DD() olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-10-13 14:20 -0500
The error of the halting problem that Ben Bacarisse did not understand olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2025-10-13 20:24 -0500
Exactly how Ben Bacarisse is proven wrong about H(D)==0 olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2025-10-14 10:28 -0500
HHH(DD)==0 and the directly executed DD() proven not in the domain of HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-10-14 10:48 -0500
Re: Exactly how Ben Bacarisse is proven wrong about H(D)==0 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-10-14 14:50 -0500
Re: The halting problem is self-contradictory -- application to c/c++ olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-10-15 10:10 -0500
The Halting Problem is Incoherent olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-10-15 11:18 -0500
The Halting Problem is Incoherent olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-10-15 14:11 -0500
Re: The halting problem is self-contradictory -- application to c/c++ "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2025-10-15 13:35 -0700
Ben Bacarisse is named because he was the best reviewer on this point olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2025-10-17 13:32 -0500
My two specifications are equivalent HHH(DD)==0 is correct olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-10-18 06:20 -0500
Re: memory_order_consume... jseigh <jseigh_es00@xemaps.com> 2025-10-18 20:48 -0400
Re: memory_order_consume... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2025-10-19 14:32 -0700
Am I cool or not ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> 2025-10-20 15:45 +0200
Exception filter Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> 2025-10-22 05:06 +0200
New and improved version of cdecl Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> 2025-10-22 14:39 -0700
Re: New and improved version of cdecl Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> 2025-10-22 22:19 -0300
I was pondering on a per-path counter... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2025-10-23 14:02 -0700
A once_flag which is failable Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> 2025-10-25 11:52 +0200
Re: For what is this class good for ? Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> 2025-10-25 16:33 +0100
No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-10-25 12:53 -0500
Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-10-25 13:33 -0500
Re: For what is this class good for ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> 2025-10-26 15:16 +0100
Claude AI understands this rebuttal of Ben --- Category Error olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2025-10-26 09:56 -0500
Halting Problem Simulation in C --- first draft of final paper olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-10-26 10:56 -0500
Re: New and improved version of cdecl Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> 2025-10-26 12:09 -0700
Re: New and improved version of cdecl "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2025-10-26 14:44 -0700
Re: New and improved version of cdecl Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> 2025-10-26 15:36 -0700
Re: New and improved version of cdecl Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> 2025-10-26 15:38 -0700
dbush is now dishonored in his deceit olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-10-26 20:56 -0500
Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-10-26 20:58 -0500
Re: dbush is now dishonored in his deceit dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> 2025-10-26 22:05 -0400
Re: dbush is now dishonored in his deceit olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-10-26 21:15 -0500
Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2025-10-26 20:15 -0600
Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-10-26 21:20 -0500
Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2025-10-26 19:25 -0700
Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> 2025-10-27 03:31 +0100
olcott tries to hide the evidence that he admitted the input to HHH(DD) is halting dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> 2025-10-26 22:33 -0400
Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> 2025-10-26 22:35 -0400
Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-10-26 21:36 -0500
Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-10-26 21:38 -0500
Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-10-26 21:45 -0500

« Previous 1 ... 56 57 58 59 60 ... 2412 Next »


csiph-web