Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c++

comp.lang.c++

120579 articles (numbers 2784 – 125744) — threaded view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date [asc]
Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> 2025-11-25 16:50 +0100
Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-11-25 10:09 -0600
Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> 2025-11-25 11:37 -0500
Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> 2025-11-25 17:33 +0000
Re: DD simulated by HHH and DD simulated by HHH1 olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-11-25 13:35 -0600
Re: DD simulated by HHH and DD simulated by HHH1 Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> 2025-11-25 20:27 +0000
Re: P!=NP proof, revised wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> 2025-11-28 11:50 +0800
Re: HHH(DD) is very obviously correct to reject its input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> 2025-11-28 11:09 -0500
Why doesn't this build? Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> 2025-12-02 20:41 +0000
Re: Why doesn't this build? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2025-12-02 13:06 -0800
Re: Why doesn't this build? Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> 2025-12-02 21:15 +0000
Re: Why doesn't this build? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2025-12-02 13:43 -0800
Re: Why doesn't this build? Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> 2025-12-03 11:05 +0000
Re: Why doesn't this build? Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> 2025-12-03 04:10 -0800
Re: Why doesn't this build? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2025-12-03 16:06 -0800
Olcott is provably correct --- no one can correctly refute this olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-12-03 19:50 -0600
Olcott is provably correct --- no one can correctly refute this olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-12-03 19:54 -0600
Olcott is provably correct --- no one can correctly refute this olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-12-03 19:55 -0600
Re: Why doesn't this build? Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> 2025-12-04 06:59 -0800
Re: Why doesn't this build? Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> 2025-12-04 16:55 +0000
Re: Why doesn't this build? Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> 2025-12-04 17:57 -0800
Re: Why doesn't this build? Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> 2025-12-04 22:00 -0800
Re: Why doesn't this build? Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> 2025-12-07 21:18 +0000
Re: Why doesn't this build? Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> 2025-12-07 14:09 -0800
Re: Why doesn't this build? Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> 2025-12-08 17:33 +0000
Re: Why doesn't this build? Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> 2025-12-08 20:17 -0800
Re: Why doesn't this build? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2025-12-09 08:56 +0100
Re: New and improved version of cdecl "Paul J. Lucas" <paul@lucasmail.org> 2025-12-09 07:31 -0800
Re: New and improved version of cdecl Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> 2025-12-09 20:38 +0000
Ben's objection finally fully addressed --- much more clearly olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2025-12-09 18:09 -0600
Re: New and improved version of cdecl "Paul J. Lucas" <paul@lucasmail.org> 2025-12-09 16:46 -0800
Re: New and improved version of cdecl Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> 2025-12-09 17:51 -0800
New Signature Line polcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-12-09 21:15 -0600
Ben's objection finally fully addressed 2.0 --- I am my own grandpa olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2025-12-09 22:33 -0600
Proof that the halting problem itself is a category error polcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-12-10 16:43 -0600
Ben Bacarisse 2022 objection finally fully addressed --- Version 4.0 olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2025-12-10 16:53 -0600
Re: Proof that the halting problem itself is a category error wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> 2025-12-11 06:58 +0800
Re: Proof that the halting problem itself is a category error polcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-12-10 17:42 -0600
Very simple first principles showing the halting problem error olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-12-11 08:38 -0600
Re: A futex'd once_flag that is failable Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> 2025-12-11 15:44 +0100
Re: P!=NP proof, revised wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> 2025-12-11 23:38 +0800
Re: Very simple first principles showing the halting problem error olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-12-11 10:05 -0600
Re: A futex'd once_flag that is failable Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> 2025-12-11 19:54 +0100
Re: Proof that the halting problem itself is a category error Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> 2025-12-12 01:56 +0000
Re: Proof that the halting problem itself is a category error olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-12-11 20:02 -0600
Re: Very simple first principles showing the halting problem error Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2025-12-12 10:20 +0200
Re: Very simple first principles showing the halting problem error olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-12-12 08:08 -0600
Re: Very simple first principles showing the halting problem error Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> 2025-12-12 09:20 -0500
Re: Very simple first principles showing the halting problem error Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2025-12-13 12:58 +0200
Defining a halt decider with perfect accuracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2025-12-13 15:32 -0600

« Previous 1 ... 51 52 53 54 55 ... 2412 Next »


csiph-web