|
Subject
|
Author
|
Date [asc]
|
|
Re: sorting performance, Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine
|
w.clodius@icloud.com (William Clodius) |
2018-03-24 23:25 -0600 |
|
Re: algorithm performance, was Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine
|
rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock) |
2018-03-25 07:02 +0000 |
|
Re: algorithm performance
|
"Robin Vowels" <robin51@dodo.com.au> |
2018-03-27 01:22 +1100 |
|
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
|
Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> |
2018-03-27 14:46 +0100 |
|
CFP: SBLP 2018 call for papers (Brazil, Sept 2018)
|
carlos.camarao@gmail.com |
2018-03-29 05:13 -0700 |
|
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
|
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) |
2018-03-30 14:20 +0000 |
|
Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format
|
"Quadibloc" <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> |
2018-04-01 12:06 -0700 |
|
Seed7 Release 2018-04-01
|
mertesthomas@gmail.com |
2018-04-01 23:43 -0700 |
|
Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format
|
"Tim Rentsch" <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> |
2018-04-06 01:01 -0700 |
|
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
|
Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> |
2018-04-06 16:09 +0100 |
|
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
|
"Derek M. Jones" <derek@_NOSPAM_knosof.co.uk> |
2018-04-08 14:21 +0100 |
|
Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format
|
"Nick Maclaren" <nmm@wheeler.UUCP> |
2018-04-09 15:05 +0000 |
|
Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format
|
"Nick Maclaren" <nmm@wheeler.UUCP> |
2018-04-09 16:45 +0000 |
|
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
|
George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> |
2018-04-09 16:51 -0400 |
|
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
|
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) |
2018-04-10 05:48 +0000 |
|
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
|
"Derek M. Jones" <derek@_NOSPAM_knosof.co.uk> |
2018-04-10 13:15 +0100 |
|
Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format
|
"Nick Maclaren" <nmm@wheeler.UUCP> |
2018-04-10 11:04 -0400 |
|
Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format
|
"Walter Banks" <walter@bytecraft.com> |
2018-04-10 11:04 -0400 |
|
Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format
|
"Walter Banks" <walter@bytecraft.com> |
2018-04-10 11:05 -0400 |
|
Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format
|
"Walter Banks" <walter@bytecraft.com> |
2018-04-10 11:06 -0400 |
|
Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format
|
"Quadibloc" <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> |
2018-04-10 11:06 -0400 |
|
Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format
|
"Walter Banks" <walter@bytecraft.com> |
2018-04-10 11:07 -0400 |
|
Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format
|
"Walter Banks" <walter@bytecraft.com> |
2018-04-10 11:08 -0400 |
|
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
|
Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> |
2018-04-10 16:11 +0100 |
|
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
|
"Derek M. Jones" <derek@_NOSPAM_knosof.co.uk> |
2018-04-10 16:56 +0100 |
|
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
|
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) |
2018-04-10 16:04 +0000 |
|
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
|
Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> |
2018-04-10 11:04 -0700 |
|
Re: Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format
|
Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> |
2018-04-10 11:07 -0700 |
|
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
|
George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> |
2018-04-10 14:32 -0400 |
|
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
|
Kaz Kylheku <157-073-9834@kylheku.com> |
2018-04-10 18:32 +0000 |
|
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
|
Kaz Kylheku <157-073-9834@kylheku.com> |
2018-04-10 18:38 +0000 |
|
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
|
"Derek M. Jones" <derek@_NOSPAM_knosof.co.uk> |
2018-04-10 23:14 +0100 |
|
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
|
Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> |
2018-04-11 13:27 +0200 |
|
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
|
"Derek M. Jones" <derek@_NOSPAM_knosof.co.uk> |
2018-04-11 20:06 +0100 |
|
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
|
Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> |
2018-04-12 01:09 +0200 |
|
ANN: TXR 191: Now with compiler.
|
Kaz Kylheku <157-073-9834@kylheku.com> |
2018-04-12 00:37 +0000 |
|
Unum numbers
|
Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> |
2018-04-12 10:29 +0200 |
|
Re: Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format
|
Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> |
2018-04-12 09:52 +0100 |
|
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
|
bartc <bc@freeuk.com> |
2018-04-12 11:51 +0100 |
|
Re: Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format
|
bartc <bc@freeuk.com> |
2018-04-12 12:15 +0100 |
|
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
|
rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock) |
2018-04-12 14:05 +0000 |
|
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
|
bartc <bc@freeuk.com> |
2018-04-12 19:40 +0100 |
|
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
|
George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> |
2018-04-12 20:51 -0400 |
|
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
|
George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> |
2018-04-12 20:57 -0400 |
|
Re: Unum numbers
|
Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> |
2018-04-12 23:13 -0400 |
|
Re: OOP language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
|
Kaz Kylheku <157-073-9834@kylheku.com> |
2018-04-13 03:22 +0000 |
|
Re: OOP language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
|
Kaz Kylheku <157-073-9834@kylheku.com> |
2018-04-13 03:28 +0000 |
|
Re: OOP language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
|
Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> |
2018-04-13 10:22 +0200 |
|
Re: Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format
|
Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> |
2018-04-13 13:35 +0100 |
|
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support
|
Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> |
2018-04-13 13:55 +0100 |