| Subject |
Author |
Date |
|
CfC Ada-Europe 2022 Conference - 27 Feb - second deadline (Belgium, June 2022
|
Dirk.Craeynest@cs.kuleuven.be (Dirk Craeynest) |
2022-01-31 17:50 +0100 |
| |
|
RE: Why no shift-shift conflicts.
|
Christopher F Clark <christopher.f.clark@compiler-resources.com> |
2022-01-30 03:14 +0200 |
| |
|
Why no shift-shift conflicts?
(5 replies — unroll)
|
Roger L Costello <costello@mitre.org> |
2022-01-25 21:58 +0000 |
|
→
Re: Why no shift-shift conflicts?
|
Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> |
2022-01-28 01:20 +0000 |
|
→
Re: Why no shift-shift conflicts?
|
Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> |
2022-01-28 10:13 +0000 |
|
→
Re: Parsing multiple inputs, was Why no shift-shift conflicts?
|
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> |
2022-01-28 19:19 +0000 |
|
→
Re: Parsing multiple inputs, was Why no shift-shift conflicts?
|
Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> |
2022-01-28 19:42 +0000 |
|
→
Re: Why no shift-shift conflicts?
|
"Ev. Drikos" <drikosev@gmail.com> |
2022-01-28 15:22 +0200 |
| |
|
Does the theory and algorithms of compiler design also apply to data formats?
(3 replies — unroll)
|
Roger L Costello <costello@mitre.org> |
2022-01-22 23:54 +0000 |
|
→
Re: Does the theory and algorithms of compiler design also apply to data formats?
|
gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> |
2022-01-22 20:33 -0800 |
|
→
Re: Does the theory and algorithms of compiler design also apply to data formats?
|
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> |
2022-01-23 21:05 +0000 |
|
→
Re: Does the theory and algorithms of compiler design also apply to data formats?
|
"matt.ti...@gmail.com" <matt.timmermans@gmail.com> |
2022-01-23 06:58 -0800 |
| |
|
Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development?
(10 replies — unroll)
|
Roger L Costello <costello@mitre.org> |
2022-01-16 14:36 +0000 |
|
→
Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development?
|
Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> |
2022-01-16 22:13 +0100 |
|
→
Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development?
|
gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> |
2022-01-17 07:14 -0800 |
|
→
Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development?
|
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) |
2022-01-19 21:33 +0000 |
|
→
Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development?
|
Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> |
2022-01-22 03:01 +0000 |
|
→
Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development?
|
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) |
2022-01-22 10:43 +0000 |
|
→
Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development?
|
Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> |
2022-01-22 21:38 +0000 |
|
→
Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development?
|
Roger L Costello <costello@mitre.org> |
2022-01-22 12:50 +0000 |
|
→
Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development?
|
Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> |
2022-01-22 21:22 +0000 |
|
→
Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development?
|
Ian Lance Taylor <ianlancetaylor@gmail.com> |
2022-01-22 15:40 -0800 |
|
→
Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development?
|
Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> |
2022-01-23 06:17 +0000 |
| |
|
Ann: HAC Ada compiler v.0.0996
|
Gautier write-only address <gautier_niouzes@hotmail.com> |
2022-01-22 05:09 -0800 |
| |
|
Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development?
(3 replies — unroll)
|
Christopher F Clark <christopher.f.clark@compiler-resources.com> |
2022-01-20 21:11 +0200 |
|
→
Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development?
|
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) |
2022-01-21 17:38 +0000 |
|
→
Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development?
|
gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> |
2022-01-21 17:40 -0800 |
|
→
Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development?
|
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) |
2022-01-22 09:34 +0000 |
| |
|
What is the meaning of an expression?
|
Christopher F Clark <christopher.f.clark@compiler-resources.com> |
2022-01-14 22:42 +0200 |
| |
|
Re: for or against equality, was Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea?
(25 replies — unroll)
|
Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> |
2022-01-05 10:25 +0000 |
|
→
Re: for or against equality, was Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea?
|
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
2022-01-06 09:11 +0100 |
|
→
Re: what is defined, was for or against equality
|
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> |
2022-01-06 16:43 +0000 |
|
→
Re: what is defined, was for or against equality
|
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
2022-01-07 12:06 +0100 |
|
→
Re: what is defined, was for or against equality
|
Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com> |
2022-01-07 13:21 +0000 |
|
→
Re: what is defined, was for or against equality
|
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> |
2022-01-08 09:31 +0000 |
|
→
Re: what is defined, was for or against equality
|
Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com> |
2022-01-08 22:28 +0000 |
|
→
Re: what is defined, was for or against equality
|
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> |
2022-01-09 00:09 +0000 |
|
→
Re: what is defined, was for or against equality
|
Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com> |
2022-01-09 21:30 +0000 |
|
→
Re: what is defined, was for or against equality
|
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
2022-01-09 23:00 +0100 |
|
→
Re: what is defined, was for or against equality
|
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> |
2022-01-10 12:04 +0000 |
|
→
Re: what is defined, was for or against equality
|
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
2022-01-11 18:16 +0100 |
|
→
Re: what is defined, was for or against equality
|
Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> |
2022-01-11 19:19 +0000 |
|
→
Re: what is defined, was for or against equality
|
gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> |
2022-01-11 14:18 -0800 |
|
→
Re: what is defined, was for or against equality
|
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> |
2022-01-12 19:02 +0000 |
|
→
Re: what is defined, was for or against equality
|
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
2022-01-13 08:24 +0100 |
|
→
Re: what is defined, was for or against equality
|
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> |
2022-01-13 11:17 +0000 |
|
→
Re: what is defined, was for or against equality
|
gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> |
2022-01-10 16:58 -0800 |
|
→
Re: for or against equality, was Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea?
|
Robert Prins <robert@prino.org> |
2022-01-06 19:07 +0000 |
|
→
Undefined behaviour, was: for or against equality
|
Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> |
2022-01-07 14:02 +0000 |
|
→
Re: Undefined behaviour, was: for or against equality
|
Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com> |
2022-01-08 03:41 +0000 |
|
→
Re: Undefined behaviour, was: for or against equality
|
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
2022-01-07 15:56 +0100 |
|
→
Re: Undefined behaviour, was: for or against equality
|
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) |
2022-01-08 17:52 +0000 |
|
→
Re: Undefined behaviour, was: for or against equality
|
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
2022-01-09 23:53 +0100 |
|
→
Re: Undefined behaviour, was: for or against equality
|
Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> |
2022-01-11 16:55 +0000 |
|
→
Re: Undefined behaviour, was: for or against equality
|
George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> |
2022-01-11 22:01 -0500 |
| |
|
Looking for Unix lex for modern systems
(6 replies — unroll)
|
arnold@skeeve.com (Aharon Robbins) |
2022-01-06 20:17 +0000 |
|
→
Re: Looking for Unix lex for modern systems
|
gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> |
2022-01-06 16:42 -0800 |
|
→
Re: Looking for Unix lex for modern systems
|
gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> |
2022-01-07 15:36 -0800 |
|
→
Re: Looking for Unix lex for modern systems
|
gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> |
2022-01-07 02:39 -0800 |
|
→
Re: Looking for Unix lex for modern systems
|
arnold@skeeve.com (Aharon Robbins) |
2022-01-09 19:04 +0000 |
|
→
Re: Looking for Unix lex for modern systems
|
gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> |
2022-01-09 17:03 -0800 |
|
→
Re: Looking for Unix lex for modern systems
|
gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> |
2022-01-12 14:45 -0800 |
| |
|
Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars?
(13 replies — unroll)
|
Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> |
2021-12-29 18:48 +0000 |
|
→
Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars?
|
Jan Ziak <0xe2.0x9a.0x9b@gmail.com> |
2021-12-29 16:05 -0800 |
|
→
Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars?
|
Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> |
2021-12-30 18:00 +0000 |
|
→
Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars?
|
Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> |
2021-12-30 20:08 +0000 |
|
→
Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars?
|
gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> |
2021-12-29 18:41 -0800 |
|
→
Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars?
|
Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> |
2021-12-30 18:14 +0000 |
|
→
Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars?
|
Jan Ziak <0xe2.0x9a.0x9b@gmail.com> |
2021-12-30 13:47 -0800 |
|
→
Re: What does = mean, was Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea?
|
Jan Ziak <0xe2.0x9a.0x9b@gmail.com> |
2021-12-30 17:10 -0800 |
|
→
Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars?
|
mac <acolvin@efunct.com> |
2022-01-03 19:51 +0000 |
|
→
Re: for or against equality, was Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea?
|
gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> |
2022-01-03 21:07 -0800 |
|
→
Re: for or against equality, was Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea?
|
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> |
2022-01-04 19:23 +0000 |
|
→
Re: for or against equality, was Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea?
|
gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> |
2022-01-04 13:26 -0800 |
|
→
Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars?
|
gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> |
2021-12-30 13:40 -0800 |
|
→
Re: why do people choose a language, was Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea?
|
Jan Ziak <0xe2.0x9a.0x9b@gmail.com> |
2021-12-30 20:19 -0800 |
| |
|
Where did "middle end" come from
(3 replies — unroll)
|
Christopher F Clark <christopher.f.clark@compiler-resources.com> |
2022-01-02 01:20 +0200 |
|
→
Re: Where did "middle end" come from
|
Derek Jones <derek@NOSPAM-knosof.co.uk> |
2022-01-02 13:19 +0000 |
|
→
RE: Where did "middle end" come from
|
Christopher F Clark <christopher.f.clark@compiler-resources.com> |
2022-01-03 15:51 +0200 |
|
→
Re: Where did "middle end" come from
|
Derek Jones <derek@knosof.co.uk> |
2022-01-03 20:07 +0000 |
| |
|
Ada-Europe 2022 Conference - 1st deadline approaching 16 Jan (Belgium, June 2022
|
Dirk.Craeynest@cs.kuleuven.be (Dirk Craeynest) |
2022-01-02 18:09 +0100 |
| |
|
Where did "middle end" come from?
|
gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> |
2022-01-01 09:43 -0800 |
| |
|
Converting a lex scanner to flex, help needed
(1 reply — unroll)
|
arnold@skeeve.com (Aharon Robbins) |
2021-12-29 20:54 +0000 |
|
→
Re: Converting a lex scanner to flex, help needed
|
arnold@skeeve.com (Aharon Robbins) |
2021-12-30 08:10 +0000 |
| |
|
Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars?
|
Jan Ziak <0xe2.0x9a.0x9b@gmail.com> |
2021-12-28 09:39 -0800 |
| |
|
Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars?
(2 replies — unroll)
|
gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> |
2021-12-27 04:18 -0800 |
|
→
Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars?
|
gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> |
2021-12-27 19:45 -0800 |
|
→
Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars?
|
Christopher F Clark <christopher.f.clark@compiler-resources.com> |
2021-12-28 16:18 +0200 |
| |
|
Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars?
|
Fernando <pronesto@gmail.com> |
2021-12-27 03:56 -0800 |
| |
|
Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars?
|
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) |
2021-12-27 09:49 +0000 |
| |
|
CfP - Ada Developer Room at FOSDEM 2022, (online Feb 2022)
|
Dirk.Craeynest@cs.kuleuven.be (Dirk Craeynest) |
2021-12-05 11:55 +0100 |