Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.compilers

comp.compilers

3680 articles, 1144 threads (numbers 61 – 3774) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
RE: Why no shift-shift conflicts. Christopher F Clark <christopher.f.clark@compiler-resources.com> 2022-01-30 03:14 +0200
 
Why no shift-shift conflicts? (5 replies — unroll) Roger L Costello <costello@mitre.org> 2022-01-25 21:58 +0000
   → Re: Why no shift-shift conflicts? Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> 2022-01-28 01:20 +0000
     → Re: Why no shift-shift conflicts? Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> 2022-01-28 10:13 +0000
       → Re: Parsing multiple inputs, was Why no shift-shift conflicts? Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> 2022-01-28 19:19 +0000
       → Re: Parsing multiple inputs, was Why no shift-shift conflicts? Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> 2022-01-28 19:42 +0000
   → Re: Why no shift-shift conflicts? "Ev. Drikos" <drikosev@gmail.com> 2022-01-28 15:22 +0200
 
Does the theory and algorithms of compiler design also apply to data formats? (3 replies — unroll) Roger L Costello <costello@mitre.org> 2022-01-22 23:54 +0000
   → Re: Does the theory and algorithms of compiler design also apply to data formats? gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> 2022-01-22 20:33 -0800
     → Re: Does the theory and algorithms of compiler design also apply to data formats? Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> 2022-01-23 21:05 +0000
   → Re: Does the theory and algorithms of compiler design also apply to data formats? "matt.ti...@gmail.com" <matt.timmermans@gmail.com> 2022-01-23 06:58 -0800
 
Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development? (10 replies — unroll) Roger L Costello <costello@mitre.org> 2022-01-16 14:36 +0000
   → Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development? Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> 2022-01-16 22:13 +0100
   → Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development? gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> 2022-01-17 07:14 -0800
   → Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) 2022-01-19 21:33 +0000
   → Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development? Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> 2022-01-22 03:01 +0000
     → Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) 2022-01-22 10:43 +0000
       → Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development? Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> 2022-01-22 21:38 +0000
     → Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development? Roger L Costello <costello@mitre.org> 2022-01-22 12:50 +0000
       → Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development? Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> 2022-01-22 21:22 +0000
       → Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development? Ian Lance Taylor <ianlancetaylor@gmail.com> 2022-01-22 15:40 -0800
         → Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development? Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> 2022-01-23 06:17 +0000
 
Ann: HAC Ada compiler v.0.0996 Gautier write-only address <gautier_niouzes@hotmail.com> 2022-01-22 05:09 -0800
 
Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development? (3 replies — unroll) Christopher F Clark <christopher.f.clark@compiler-resources.com> 2022-01-20 21:11 +0200
   → Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) 2022-01-21 17:38 +0000
     → Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development? gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> 2022-01-21 17:40 -0800
       → Re: Are compiler developers light-years ahead of other software development? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) 2022-01-22 09:34 +0000
 
What is the meaning of an expression? Christopher F Clark <christopher.f.clark@compiler-resources.com> 2022-01-14 22:42 +0200
 
Re: for or against equality, was Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? (25 replies — unroll) Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> 2022-01-05 10:25 +0000
   → Re: for or against equality, was Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2022-01-06 09:11 +0100
     → Re: what is defined, was for or against equality Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> 2022-01-06 16:43 +0000
       → Re: what is defined, was for or against equality David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2022-01-07 12:06 +0100
       → Re: what is defined, was for or against equality Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com> 2022-01-07 13:21 +0000
         → Re: what is defined, was for or against equality Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> 2022-01-08 09:31 +0000
           → Re: what is defined, was for or against equality Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com> 2022-01-08 22:28 +0000
             → Re: what is defined, was for or against equality Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> 2022-01-09 00:09 +0000
               → Re: what is defined, was for or against equality Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com> 2022-01-09 21:30 +0000
           → Re: what is defined, was for or against equality David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2022-01-09 23:00 +0100
             → Re: what is defined, was for or against equality Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> 2022-01-10 12:04 +0000
               → Re: what is defined, was for or against equality David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2022-01-11 18:16 +0100
                 → Re: what is defined, was for or against equality Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> 2022-01-11 19:19 +0000
                 → Re: what is defined, was for or against equality gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> 2022-01-11 14:18 -0800
                 → Re: what is defined, was for or against equality Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> 2022-01-12 19:02 +0000
                 → Re: what is defined, was for or against equality David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2022-01-13 08:24 +0100
                 → Re: what is defined, was for or against equality Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> 2022-01-13 11:17 +0000
           → Re: what is defined, was for or against equality gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> 2022-01-10 16:58 -0800
     → Re: for or against equality, was Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Robert Prins <robert@prino.org> 2022-01-06 19:07 +0000
     → Undefined behaviour, was: for or against equality Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> 2022-01-07 14:02 +0000
       → Re: Undefined behaviour, was: for or against equality Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com> 2022-01-08 03:41 +0000
     → Re: Undefined behaviour, was: for or against equality David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2022-01-07 15:56 +0100
       → Re: Undefined behaviour, was: for or against equality anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) 2022-01-08 17:52 +0000
         → Re: Undefined behaviour, was: for or against equality David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2022-01-09 23:53 +0100
         → Re: Undefined behaviour, was: for or against equality Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> 2022-01-11 16:55 +0000
           → Re: Undefined behaviour, was: for or against equality George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> 2022-01-11 22:01 -0500
 
Looking for Unix lex for modern systems (6 replies — unroll) arnold@skeeve.com (Aharon Robbins) 2022-01-06 20:17 +0000
   → Re: Looking for Unix lex for modern systems gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> 2022-01-06 16:42 -0800
     → Re: Looking for Unix lex for modern systems gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> 2022-01-07 15:36 -0800
   → Re: Looking for Unix lex for modern systems gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> 2022-01-07 02:39 -0800
     → Re: Looking for Unix lex for modern systems arnold@skeeve.com (Aharon Robbins) 2022-01-09 19:04 +0000
       → Re: Looking for Unix lex for modern systems gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> 2022-01-09 17:03 -0800
         → Re: Looking for Unix lex for modern systems gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> 2022-01-12 14:45 -0800
 
Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars? (13 replies — unroll) Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> 2021-12-29 18:48 +0000
   → Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars? Jan Ziak <0xe2.0x9a.0x9b@gmail.com> 2021-12-29 16:05 -0800
     → Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars? Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> 2021-12-30 18:00 +0000
       → Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars? Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> 2021-12-30 20:08 +0000
   → Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars? gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> 2021-12-29 18:41 -0800
     → Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars? Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> 2021-12-30 18:14 +0000
       → Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars? Jan Ziak <0xe2.0x9a.0x9b@gmail.com> 2021-12-30 13:47 -0800
         → Re: What does = mean, was Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Jan Ziak <0xe2.0x9a.0x9b@gmail.com> 2021-12-30 17:10 -0800
         → Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars? mac <acolvin@efunct.com> 2022-01-03 19:51 +0000
           → Re: for or against equality, was Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> 2022-01-03 21:07 -0800
             → Re: for or against equality, was Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> 2022-01-04 19:23 +0000
             → Re: for or against equality, was Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> 2022-01-04 13:26 -0800
     → Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars? gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> 2021-12-30 13:40 -0800
   → Re: why do people choose a language, was Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Jan Ziak <0xe2.0x9a.0x9b@gmail.com> 2021-12-30 20:19 -0800
 
Where did "middle end" come from (3 replies — unroll) Christopher F Clark <christopher.f.clark@compiler-resources.com> 2022-01-02 01:20 +0200
   → Re: Where did "middle end" come from Derek Jones <derek@NOSPAM-knosof.co.uk> 2022-01-02 13:19 +0000
     → RE: Where did "middle end" come from Christopher F Clark <christopher.f.clark@compiler-resources.com> 2022-01-03 15:51 +0200
       → Re: Where did "middle end" come from Derek Jones <derek@knosof.co.uk> 2022-01-03 20:07 +0000
 
Ada-Europe 2022 Conference - 1st deadline approaching 16 Jan (Belgium, June 2022 Dirk.Craeynest@cs.kuleuven.be (Dirk Craeynest) 2022-01-02 18:09 +0100
 
Where did "middle end" come from? gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> 2022-01-01 09:43 -0800
 
Converting a lex scanner to flex, help needed (1 reply — unroll) arnold@skeeve.com (Aharon Robbins) 2021-12-29 20:54 +0000
   → Re: Converting a lex scanner to flex, help needed arnold@skeeve.com (Aharon Robbins) 2021-12-30 08:10 +0000
 
Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars? Jan Ziak <0xe2.0x9a.0x9b@gmail.com> 2021-12-28 09:39 -0800
 
Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars? (2 replies — unroll) gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> 2021-12-27 04:18 -0800
   → Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars? gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> 2021-12-27 19:45 -0800
   → Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars? Christopher F Clark <christopher.f.clark@compiler-resources.com> 2021-12-28 16:18 +0200
 
Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars? Fernando <pronesto@gmail.com> 2021-12-27 03:56 -0800
 
Re: Why are ambiguous grammars usually a bad idea? Why are languages usually defined and implemented with ambiguous grammars? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) 2021-12-27 09:49 +0000
 
CfP - Ada Developer Room at FOSDEM 2022, (online Feb 2022) Dirk.Craeynest@cs.kuleuven.be (Dirk Craeynest) 2021-12-05 11:55 +0100
 
Union C++ standard (13 replies — unroll) Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> 2021-11-25 11:11 +0100
   → Re: Union C++ standard Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> 2021-11-26 18:06 +0000
   → Re: Union C++ standard gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> 2021-11-26 12:16 -0800
   → Re: Union C++ standard David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2021-11-27 16:59 +0100
     → Re: Union C++ standard Derek Jones <derek@NOSPAM-knosof.co.uk> 2021-11-28 12:51 +0000
       → Re: Union C++ standard David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2021-11-28 19:00 +0100
         → Re: Union C++ standard Derek Jones <derek@NOSPAM-knosof.co.uk> 2021-11-29 00:09 +0000
           → Re: Union C++ standard David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2021-11-29 21:00 +0100
             → Re: Union C++ standard Derek Jones <derek@NOSPAM-knosof.co.uk> 2021-11-30 00:46 +0000
               → Re: Union C++ standard George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> 2021-11-30 17:18 -0500
                 → Re: Union C++ standard terminology Derek Jones <derek@knosof.co.uk> 2021-12-01 13:35 +0000
               → Re: Union C++ standard David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2021-11-30 23:24 +0100
         → Re: Union C++ standard Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> 2021-11-29 16:39 +0000
           → Re: Union C++ standard Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> 2021-11-29 14:32 -0800

← Newer ~Page 14 of ~58 (articles 2765–2877) Older →


csiph-web