Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.compilers

comp.compilers

3687 articles, 1146 threads (numbers 61 – 3781) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
Call for papers: LLVM Student Research Competition (SRC) 2018 (San Jose CA, Oct 2018) Nuno Lopes <nlopes@microsoft.com> 2018-07-21 14:40 +0000
 
LLVM-HPC2018 Workshop at SC18 - Call for papers (Texas, Nov 18) Hal Finkel <hfinkel@anl.gov> 2018-07-11 19:36 -0500
 
Seed7 Release 2018-07-08 mertesthomas@gmail.com 2018-07-08 14:55 -0700
 
Seed7 Release 2018-06-01 mertesthomas@gmail.com 2018-06-01 14:07 -0700
 
GPCE 2018 2nd Call for Papers: Boston, MA, USA, Nov 5,6 2018 Eric Van Wyk <evw@umn.edu> 2018-05-27 16:50 -0500
 
Re: Compiler implementation language preference ? Bruce Mardle <marblypup@yahoo.co.uk> 2018-05-23 07:33 -0700
 
Seed7 Release 2018-05-13 mertesthomas@gmail.com 2018-05-13 02:10 -0700
 
Cross-compiler from Windows to Mac OSX? (7 replies — unroll) Leff Ivanov <droiddermo@gmail.com> 2018-02-01 06:38 -0800
   → Re: Cross-compiler from Windows to Mac OSX? Kaz Kylheku <217-679-0842@kylheku.com> 2018-02-02 02:35 +0000
   → Re: Cross-compiler from Windows to Mac OSX? Marco van de Voort <marcov@toad.stack.nl> 2018-02-02 14:13 +0000
   → Re: Cross-compiler from Windows to Mac OSX? alexfrunews@gmail.com 2018-02-14 19:42 -0800
   → Re: Cross-compiler from Windows to Mac OSX? Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> 2018-02-17 10:41 +0100
     → Re: Cross-compiler from Windows to Mac OSX? Leff Ivanov <droiddermo@gmail.com> 2018-03-01 13:47 -0500
   → Re: Cross-compiler from Windows to Mac OSX? albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) 2018-05-05 13:16 +0200
     → Re: Cross-compiler from Windows to Mac OSX? albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) 2018-05-05 20:33 +0200
 
Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format (3 replies — unroll) "Walter Banks" <walter@bytecraft.com> 2018-04-10 11:07 -0400
   → Re: Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> 2018-04-10 11:07 -0700
     → Re: Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> 2018-04-12 09:52 +0100
       → Re: Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) 2018-05-05 20:28 +0200
 
Ada-Europe 2018 - early registration until May 14 Dirk Craeynest <Dirk.Craeynest@cs.kuleuven.be> 2018-05-08 23:42 +0200
 
Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine (56 replies — unroll) Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> 2018-03-12 16:17 +0000
   → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine Kaz Kylheku <157-073-9834@kylheku.com> 2018-03-13 03:02 +0000
     → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> 2018-03-19 11:04 +0000
       → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> 2018-03-19 12:50 -0700
         → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine Kaz Kylheku <157-073-9834@kylheku.com> 2018-03-20 16:16 +0000
         → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> 2018-03-23 10:44 +0000
           → Re: algorithm performance, was Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> 2018-03-23 18:47 +0000
             → Re: algorithm performance, was Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) 2018-03-24 14:06 +0000
               → Re: algorithm performance, was Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock) 2018-03-25 07:02 +0000
                 → Re: algorithm performance "Robin Vowels" <robin51@dodo.com.au> 2018-03-27 01:22 +1100
           → Re: sorting performance, Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine w.clodius@icloud.com (William Clodius) 2018-03-24 23:25 -0600
       → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) 2018-03-20 09:06 +0000
         → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine Bill Findlay <findlaybill@blueyonder.co.uk> 2018-03-20 12:49 +0000
         → Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> 2018-03-27 14:46 +0100
           → Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) 2018-03-30 14:20 +0000
           → Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> 2018-04-06 16:09 +0100
             → Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support "Derek M. Jones" <derek@_NOSPAM_knosof.co.uk> 2018-04-08 14:21 +0100
               → Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> 2018-04-09 16:51 -0400
                 → Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) 2018-04-10 05:48 +0000
                 → Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> 2018-04-10 14:32 -0400
                 → Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> 2018-04-12 01:09 +0200
                 → Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support bartc <bc@freeuk.com> 2018-04-12 11:51 +0100
                 → Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support bartc <bc@freeuk.com> 2018-04-12 19:40 +0100
                 → Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> 2018-04-13 14:10 +0100
                 → Re: language design after Algol 60 "Robin Vowels" <robin51@dodo.com.au> 2018-04-14 14:11 +1000
                 → RE: language design after Algol 60 "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> 2018-04-16 12:56 +0000
                 → Re: language design after Algol 60 "Robin Vowels" <robin51@dodo.com.au> 2018-04-17 19:08 +1000
                 → Re: Language design after Algol 60 "Robin Vowels" <robin51@dodo.com.au> 2018-04-18 14:58 +1000
                 → Re: language design after Algol 60 Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> 2018-04-18 16:12 -0700
                 → Re: language design after Algol 60 Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> 2018-05-01 10:42 +0100
                 → Re: language design after Algol 60 "Robin Vowels" <robin51@dodo.com.au> 2018-04-14 14:19 +1000
                 → Re: language design after Algol 60 bartc <bc@freeuk.com> 2018-04-14 20:43 +0100
                 → Re: language design after Algol 60 Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> 2018-04-15 00:04 +0100
                 → Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock) 2018-04-12 14:05 +0000
                 → Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> 2018-04-12 20:51 -0400
                 → Re: OOP language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support Kaz Kylheku <157-073-9834@kylheku.com> 2018-04-13 03:22 +0000
                 → Re: OOP language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> 2018-04-13 10:22 +0200
                 → Re: OOP language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> 2018-04-14 13:40 -0400
                 → Re: OOP language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> 2018-04-15 00:12 +0200
                 → Re: OOP language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> 2018-04-15 00:23 +0200
                 → Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support "Derek M. Jones" <derek@_NOSPAM_knosof.co.uk> 2018-04-10 13:15 +0100
                 → Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> 2018-04-11 13:27 +0200
                 → Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support "Derek M. Jones" <derek@_NOSPAM_knosof.co.uk> 2018-04-11 20:06 +0100
                 → Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support Kaz Kylheku <157-073-9834@kylheku.com> 2018-04-10 18:32 +0000
                 → Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> 2018-04-12 20:57 -0400
                 → Re: OOP language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support Kaz Kylheku <157-073-9834@kylheku.com> 2018-04-13 03:28 +0000
             → Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) 2018-05-05 13:50 +0200
       → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine mac <acolvin@efunct.com> 2018-03-20 15:27 +0000
   → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine w.clodius@icloud.com (William Clodius) 2018-03-12 21:09 -0600
     → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine Kartik Agaram <ak@akkartik.com> 2018-03-13 13:27 -0700
       → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine Kaz Kylheku <157-073-9834@kylheku.com> 2018-03-14 00:07 +0000
         → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine Kartik Agaram <ak@akkartik.com> 2018-03-13 22:31 -0700
           → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine Kaz Kylheku <157-073-9834@kylheku.com> 2018-03-14 14:49 +0000
     → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine Kaz Kylheku <157-073-9834@kylheku.com> 2018-03-13 20:51 +0000
     → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> 2018-03-14 00:27 +0000
       → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> 2018-03-14 16:37 +0000
   → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) 2018-03-14 15:16 +0000
 
Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine (28 replies — unroll) dror.openu@gmail.com 2018-02-12 11:25 -0800
   → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine dror.openu@gmail.com 2018-02-12 14:16 -0800
     → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> 2018-02-13 12:10 +0100
   → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine Louis Krupp <lkrupp@nospam.pssw.com.invalid> 2018-02-13 00:42 -0700
     → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine Kaz Kylheku <217-679-0842@kylheku.com> 2018-02-14 00:59 +0000
       → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> 2018-02-13 22:04 -0500
         → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine Kaz Kylheku <217-679-0842@kylheku.com> 2018-02-14 18:06 +0000
           → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> 2018-02-15 11:41 -0500
             → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine Kaz Kylheku <217-679-0842@kylheku.com> 2018-02-17 16:13 +0000
               → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) 2018-02-17 16:39 +0000
                 → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> 2018-03-01 13:48 -0500
                 → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine Kaz Kylheku <217-679-0842@kylheku.com> 2018-03-01 19:26 +0000
                 → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine Kaz Kylheku <217-679-0842@kylheku.com> 2018-03-02 00:38 +0000
                 → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> 2018-03-02 02:48 -0500
                 → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock) 2018-03-03 16:00 +0000
                 → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) 2018-03-02 09:30 +0000
                 → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) 2018-03-05 15:01 +0000
                 → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> 2018-03-05 15:51 -0500
                 → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> 2018-03-05 14:39 -0500
                 → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> 2018-03-06 04:31 +0000
                 → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine Kaz Kylheku <217-679-0842@kylheku.com> 2018-03-06 18:17 +0000
                 → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine Kaz Kylheku <157-073-9834@kylheku.com> 2018-03-11 03:19 +0000
                 → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine Tomasz Kowaltowski <tk@ic.unicamp.br> 2018-03-06 12:10 -0300
                 → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine bartc <bc@freeuk.com> 2018-03-06 19:02 +0000
                 → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl 2018-04-29 16:29 +0000
               → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> 2018-03-01 13:49 -0500
     → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> 2018-02-13 22:37 -0500
   → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> 2018-02-13 23:27 -0500
   → Re: Add nested-function support in a language the based on a stack-machine Shoefoot <shoefoot@gmail.com> 2018-02-14 12:27 -0800
 
Unum numbers (2 replies — unroll) Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> 2018-04-12 10:29 +0200
   → Re: Unum numbers Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> 2018-04-12 23:13 -0400
     → Re: Unum numbers Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> 2018-04-18 10:50 +0200
 
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support (6 replies — unroll) Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> 2018-04-10 16:11 +0100
   → Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support "Derek M. Jones" <derek@_NOSPAM_knosof.co.uk> 2018-04-10 16:56 +0100
   → Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) 2018-04-10 16:04 +0000
     → Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support "Derek M. Jones" <derek@_NOSPAM_knosof.co.uk> 2018-04-10 23:14 +0100
       → Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> 2018-04-13 13:55 +0100
   → Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> 2018-04-10 11:04 -0700
   → Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support Kaz Kylheku <157-073-9834@kylheku.com> 2018-04-10 18:38 +0000
 
Re: Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> 2018-04-13 13:35 +0100
 
Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format (1 reply — unroll) "Walter Banks" <walter@bytecraft.com> 2018-04-10 11:05 -0400
   → Re: Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format bartc <bc@freeuk.com> 2018-04-12 12:15 +0100
 
ANN: TXR 191: Now with compiler. Kaz Kylheku <157-073-9834@kylheku.com> 2018-04-12 00:37 +0000
 
Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Walter Banks" <walter@bytecraft.com> 2018-04-10 11:08 -0400
 
Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Tim Rentsch" <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> 2018-04-06 01:01 -0700
 
Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Quadibloc" <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> 2018-04-10 11:06 -0400

← Newer ~Page 27 of ~58 (articles 2042–2104) Older →


csiph-web