Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.windows.x > #558
| From | gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.windows.x |
| Subject | Re: why X |
| Date | 2024-05-22 15:51 +0000 |
| Organization | The official candy of the new Millennium |
| Message-ID | <v2l4at$19ra3$2@news.xmission.com> (permalink) |
| References | <E9TTqC5XlaglCPCF@violet.siamics.net> <slrnv4ktqj.pi7.anthk@localhost.localdomain> <v2etjf$3savv$1@dont-email.me> |
In article <v2etjf$3savv$1@dont-email.me>, <Muttley@dastardlyhq.com> wrote: ... >It seems to me the main argument for Wayland is "Its not X". When you try and Change or die. (aka, change for change's sake) >find out what its actual advantages are you get vague nonsense about >security and lack of cruft and a faster graphic instruction -> hardware path >, which may be true but the difference will be minimal with modern X >extensions and all but invisible with 99.9% of graphical applications unless >you maybe care about 60fps vs 65fps in some game. > The Raspberry Pi world recently made the switch. They claim better performance on their "big" boards (the Pi4 and Pi5), but retain X for their earlier models. Which, on the face of it, is odd, since you would think you'd care the most about performance on the lesser boards. No, I'm not looking for an explanation of this. -- Hindsight is (supposed to be) 2020. Trumpers, don't make the same mistake twice. Don't shoot yourself in the feet - and everywhere else - again!.
Back to comp.windows.x | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
why X Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> - 2024-05-11 17:35 +0000
Re: why X Marco Moock <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de> - 2024-05-11 20:07 +0200
Re: why X Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> - 2024-05-22 09:25 +0000
Re: why X Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-05-22 22:07 +0000
Re: why X Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> - 2024-05-23 13:57 +0000
Re: why X Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-05-23 22:00 +0000
Re: why X Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2024-05-24 08:47 +0000
Re: why X not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-05-15 09:37 +1000
Re: why X Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-05-15 00:48 +0000
Re: why X not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-05-16 09:05 +1000
Re: why X Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-05-16 00:06 +0000
Re: why X Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2024-05-16 17:18 +1000
Re: why X Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> - 2024-05-22 08:55 +0000
Re: why X not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-05-24 09:41 +1000
Re: why X Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-05-24 00:29 +0000
Re: why X Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2024-05-24 21:35 +1000
Re: why X Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-05-24 21:37 +0000
Re: why X Bozo User <anthk@disroot.org> - 2024-05-20 06:43 +0000
Re: why X Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2024-05-20 07:20 +0000
Re: why X gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2024-05-22 15:51 +0000
Re: why X Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-05-20 22:29 +0000
Re: why X Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2024-05-21 07:20 +0000
csiph-web