Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #835127

Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially

From Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially
Date 2021-11-05 23:40 -0400
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <sm4tf2$964$3@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <7c54e8c0-b0c6-4cb6-a853-52563e24c656n@googlegroups.com> <409ca82e-6813-43cb-97c6-71acf78e4e1dn@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 11/5/2021 8:38 PM, Giovanni wrote:
>> Paolo Monsurro in Italy wrote:
>> the instant of death is a bit too much
> 
> Establishing the instant of death of a death is only a technical and not a physical fact, in fact at the moment we are able to establish, with precision, the day and time of a death, but technically we can improve, as in reality it has happened and is happening , and thus reaching a perfect precision, and who knows that a super-technological alien civilization has not already succeeded.
> 
> Therefore, establishing the instant of death is true by definition, because we can ignore the imprecision that is introduced in the concept of the instant of death, since it can be overcome, as I have shown above, in the near future, and / or through an abstraction (thanks to the hypothesis of a super-technological alien civilization).

So the train observer sees the canary at the front of the car killed 
before the canary at the rear of the car is killed.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Giovanni <giannifree@gmail.com> - 2021-11-05 15:24 -0700
  Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2021-11-06 10:14 +1100
  Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-11-05 18:17 -0500
    Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Giovanni <giannifree@gmail.com> - 2021-11-05 17:55 -0700
  Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Giovanni <giannifree@gmail.com> - 2021-11-05 17:38 -0700
    Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-11-05 23:40 -0400
      Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Giovanni <giannifree@gmail.com> - 2021-11-06 02:32 -0700
        Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2021-11-06 21:56 +1100
          Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Giovanni <giannifree@gmail.com> - 2021-11-06 04:14 -0700
            Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Giovanni <giannifree@gmail.com> - 2021-11-06 04:39 -0700
              Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Giovanni <giannifree@gmail.com> - 2021-11-06 04:48 -0700
            Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2021-11-07 09:20 +1100
              Einstein's relativity confuses country folk. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2021-11-06 15:46 -0700
                Re: Einstein's relativity confuses country folk. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-06 21:21 -0700
              Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Giovanni <giannifree@gmail.com> - 2021-11-07 04:20 -0800
        Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-11-06 13:19 -0400
  Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-11-06 05:49 -0700
    Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-11-06 10:35 -0500
      Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-11-06 13:24 -0700
  Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-11-06 10:27 -0700
    Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Giovanni <giannifree@gmail.com> - 2021-11-08 01:06 -0800

csiph-web