Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #835127
| From | Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially |
| Date | 2021-11-05 23:40 -0400 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <sm4tf2$964$3@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <7c54e8c0-b0c6-4cb6-a853-52563e24c656n@googlegroups.com> <409ca82e-6813-43cb-97c6-71acf78e4e1dn@googlegroups.com> |
On 11/5/2021 8:38 PM, Giovanni wrote: >> Paolo Monsurro in Italy wrote: >> the instant of death is a bit too much > > Establishing the instant of death of a death is only a technical and not a physical fact, in fact at the moment we are able to establish, with precision, the day and time of a death, but technically we can improve, as in reality it has happened and is happening , and thus reaching a perfect precision, and who knows that a super-technological alien civilization has not already succeeded. > > Therefore, establishing the instant of death is true by definition, because we can ignore the imprecision that is introduced in the concept of the instant of death, since it can be overcome, as I have shown above, in the near future, and / or through an abstraction (thanks to the hypothesis of a super-technological alien civilization). So the train observer sees the canary at the front of the car killed before the canary at the rear of the car is killed.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Giovanni <giannifree@gmail.com> - 2021-11-05 15:24 -0700
Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2021-11-06 10:14 +1100
Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-11-05 18:17 -0500
Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Giovanni <giannifree@gmail.com> - 2021-11-05 17:55 -0700
Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Giovanni <giannifree@gmail.com> - 2021-11-05 17:38 -0700
Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-11-05 23:40 -0400
Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Giovanni <giannifree@gmail.com> - 2021-11-06 02:32 -0700
Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2021-11-06 21:56 +1100
Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Giovanni <giannifree@gmail.com> - 2021-11-06 04:14 -0700
Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Giovanni <giannifree@gmail.com> - 2021-11-06 04:39 -0700
Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Giovanni <giannifree@gmail.com> - 2021-11-06 04:48 -0700
Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2021-11-07 09:20 +1100
Einstein's relativity confuses country folk. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-11-06 15:46 -0700
Re: Einstein's relativity confuses country folk. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-06 21:21 -0700
Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Giovanni <giannifree@gmail.com> - 2021-11-07 04:20 -0800
Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-11-06 13:19 -0400
Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-11-06 05:49 -0700
Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-11-06 10:35 -0500
Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2021-11-06 13:24 -0700
Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-11-06 10:27 -0700
Re: Einstein's 1905 nonsense about simultaneity highlighted even more trivially Giovanni <giannifree@gmail.com> - 2021-11-08 01:06 -0800
csiph-web