Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #672221

Re: Linux advocacy

From	candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: Linux advocacy
Date	2024-10-02 19:30 +0000
Organization	the-candyden-of-code
Message-ID	<slrnvfr7mu.2hs3k.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> (permalink)
References	(11 earlier) <vd2srh$2ohs$4@dont-email.me> <da3bfj1rbd78ct1dhikqj28fk5uhu2q11u@4ax.com> <vddk1c$254hd$6@dont-email.me> <slrnvflgcf.lr8.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> <_iHKO.243816$v8v2.95799@fx18.iad>

Show all headers | View raw

CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote at 00:24 this Tuesday (GMT):
> On 2024-09-30 3:40 p.m., candycanearter07 wrote:
>> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote at 07:29 this Monday (GMT):
>>> On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 12:37:56 -0400, Joel wrote:
>>>
>>>> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> It has Unix within it, I grant that ...
>>>>>
>>>>> No, it has the legal right to use the “Unix” trademark, which is not
>>>>> quite what normal people mean when they say “It’s a Unix system, I know
>>>>> this!”.
>>>>
>>>> That's not really true, you can do anything with it ...
>>>
>>> Not quite. Apple is insisting on signed software now, so users of Open
>>> Source have to negotiate continual off-putting warnings about “untrusted”
>>> apps every time they try to install something.
>> 
>> 
>> Not surprised.
>
> There's nothing wrong with signing software if you want to limit the 
> damage of malware. Open-source will probably work as long as the 
> software is listed in the Apple Store though.


Yeah, but it would obviously be bad to be forced to publish thru the App
Store
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Linux advocacy Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-09-30 07:29 +0000
  Re: Linux advocacy candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-09-30 19:40 +0000
    Re: Linux advocacy CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-09-30 20:24 -0400
      Re: Linux advocacy Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-09-30 20:54 -0400
      Re: Linux advocacy candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-10-02 19:30 +0000
        Re: Linux advocacy CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-10-02 15:44 -0400
          Re: Linux advocacy candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-10-03 15:30 +0000
            Re: Linux advocacy CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-10-03 12:13 -0400
              Re: Linux advocacy rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-10-03 17:47 +0000
            Re: Linux advocacy Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-10-03 13:53 -0400
      Re: Linux advocacy Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-03 23:12 +0000
        Re: Linux advocacy candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-10-03 23:30 +0000

csiph-web