Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > uk.comp.sys.mac > #117456
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | uk.comp.sys.mac, comp.sys.mac.system |
| Subject | Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... |
| Date | 2017-04-27 09:41 +0000 |
| Organization | Miskatonic U |
| Message-ID | <slrnog3fbe.jnv.g.kreme@snow.local> (permalink) |
| References | <2017042619201161432-gavin.lawrie@2gc.eu> <590104a9$0$36059$c3e8da3$76a7c58f@news.astraweb.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
In message <590104a9$0$36059$c3e8da3$76a7c58f@news.astraweb.com> JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > On 2017-04-26 14:20, glawrie wrote: >> https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/17/04/25/0617219/intel-launches-optane-memory-that-makes-standard-hard-drives-perform-like-ssds >> The Intel version appears to do the same thing. > Very very different. Apple is glorified Raid 1 with software to > automatically and dynamically manage placement of FILES on the > multi-disk logical volume. And it does increase storage camapcity. No, it is nothing at all like RAID 1. Nothing. At all. Fusion creates a single core storage volume using up the combined space of the HDD and the SSD. Ther is no mirroring involved. Frequently accessed files are managed by CoreStorage and moved to the SSD portion of the fusion drive without the knowledge or intervention of the OS or the applications. Most used files are simply on a faster medium. Fusion worked very well, but I am sure Intel's new version, being restricted to the newest OS, newest chips, and therefore newest machines, will perform better. Nothing beats a 500GB or larger SSD boot drive though, and Apple has moved on from spinning hard drives. Even the bottom of the line 2015 Mac mini has speed benchmarks in excess of 500MB/s read/write. -- ...but the senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity.
Back to uk.comp.sys.mac | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... glawrie <gavin.lawrie@2gc.eu> - 2017-04-26 19:20 +0100
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2017-04-26 19:47 +0100
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-04-26 16:35 -0400
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2017-04-27 08:04 +0100
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2017-04-27 09:41 +0000
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-04-27 13:52 -0400
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-04-27 18:19 +0000
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... nmassello@yahoo.com (Neill Massello) - 2017-04-27 20:54 -0600
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-04-28 05:30 +0000
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2017-04-28 11:14 +0000
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-04-28 14:49 -0400
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-04-28 19:08 +0000
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-04-28 22:56 -0400
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-04-29 14:34 +0000
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2017-04-29 15:19 +0000
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-04-28 21:30 -0700
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... Elliott Roper <nospam@yrl.co.uk> - 2017-04-29 15:18 +1000
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... Jaimie Vandenbergh <jaimie@sometimes.sessile.org> - 2017-04-29 09:45 +0100
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-29 09:30 -0400
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... Jaimie Vandenbergh <jaimie@sometimes.sessile.org> - 2017-04-29 14:58 +0100
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-29 10:22 -0400
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-04-29 14:13 -0400
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-29 14:19 -0400
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-04-29 14:52 -0400
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-29 14:57 -0400
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-04-29 15:32 -0400
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-29 15:32 -0400
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2017-04-29 19:53 +0000
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2017-04-29 22:59 +0100
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-04-29 22:04 +0000
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-04-29 14:07 -0400
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2017-04-29 20:54 +0000
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-04-29 14:44 +0000
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-04-29 01:35 -0400
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... Jaimie Vandenbergh <jaimie@sometimes.sessile.org> - 2017-04-29 09:39 +0100
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-04-29 14:49 +0000
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2017-04-29 19:58 +0000
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... nmassello@yahoo.com (Neill Massello) - 2017-04-29 16:08 -0600
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... Fred <fredb@[127.0.0.1]> - 2017-04-29 23:35 +0100
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-04-29 22:44 +0000
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-04-30 22:45 -0700
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-05-01 02:09 -0400
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-04-30 23:20 -0700
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2017-05-01 09:28 +0100
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-05-01 13:30 -0400
Re: Five years later... Intel launches Fusion Drive for Wintel... Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2017-05-01 09:02 +0000
csiph-web