Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.os2.setup.storage > #72
| From | Paul Ratcliffe <abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.os2.setup.storage |
| Subject | Re: Multiple "Visible" Primaries |
| Date | 2012-12-16 23:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnkcsnrf.4cg.abuse@news.pr.network> (permalink) |
| References | <50B3CF83.30906@dev.nul> <slrnkb7nqt.sk5.abuse@news.pr.network> <D_WdnRSZNZcYoynNnZ2dnUVZ_oednZ2d@earthlink.com> <sUWI7rB18pBd-pn2-1yjGDyEf0dsn@localhost> |
On 27 Nov 2012 16:19:56 GMT, ivan <ivanjt@free.fr> wrote: > Like Paul I have known about this for about 25 years and, in fact, > still have an old DOS computer with a 10 MB hard disk that has 4 non > hidden primary partitions on it. > > Where the idea of primary partitions having to be hidden originates I > don't know. It might come from trying to set up a multi boot system > booting from a primary partition when each boot partition required the > same letter therefore you had to hide the one(s) you weren't booting > from. This is only applicable to windows systems because OS/2 quite > happily boots from a logical partition. Yes, it was another bit of brilliance from those geniuses in Redmond.
Back to comp.os.os2.setup.storage | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Multiple "Visible" Primaries Felix Miata <UgaddaBkidding.due2UCE@dev.nul> - 2012-11-26 15:22 -0500
Re: Multiple "Visible" Primaries Paul Ratcliffe <abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78> - 2012-11-26 21:30 +0000
Re: Multiple "Visible" Primaries Felix Miata <UgaddaBkidding.due2UCE@dev.nul> - 2012-11-26 23:16 -0500
Re: Multiple "Visible" Primaries "ivan" <ivanjt@free.fr> - 2012-11-27 16:19 +0000
Re: Multiple "Visible" Primaries Felix Miata <UgaddaBkidding.due2UCE@dev.nul> - 2012-11-27 13:53 -0500
Re: Multiple "Visible" Primaries "Peter J. Seymour" <Newsgroups@pjsey.demon.co.uk> - 2012-11-28 09:51 +0000
Re: Multiple "Visible" Primaries Barry Landy <bl10nospam@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-11-28 10:41 +0000
Re: Multiple "Visible" Primaries Paul Ratcliffe <abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78> - 2012-12-16 23:58 +0000
Re: Multiple "Visible" Primaries "Peter J. Seymour" <Newsgroups@pjsey.demon.co.uk> - 2012-12-17 08:18 +0000
Re: Multiple "Visible" Primaries Paul Ratcliffe <abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78> - 2012-12-16 23:55 +0000
Re: Multiple "Visible" Primaries Paul Ratcliffe <abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78> - 2012-12-16 23:53 +0000
csiph-web