Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #33366

Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile

Show all headers | View raw

On 2011-06-14, Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> wrote:
> RayLopez99 wrote:
>> I'll also point out that ARM is cheaper because it's the new kid on
>> the block.
>
> "New kid on the block"? ARM is almost three decades old and completely 
> dominates the low power, mobile and embedded CPUs market.

...it also started out as a "desktop" processor back in the day.

I could get into an ARM equivalent of an ION nettop. Intel kit tends to
generate too much heat. So do nvidia parts. Both my IONs and Macs have
to run their fans pretty hard to deal with the heat they tend to generate.

[deletia]

However, I would not bother with ARM on any machine I wanted a decent CPU on.

-- 

   Unauthorized distribution of your work is going to happen. That      ||| 
particular genie left the bottle a long time ago. You can either be    / | \ 
cool about it and possibly gain from it or big the biggest jerk you   
can be and alienate potential fans.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Why Intel will fail in mobile Anonymous <cripto@ecn.org> - 2011-06-14 16:17 +0200
  Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 10:32 -0700
    Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 10:34 -0700
      Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2011-06-14 19:46 +0100
        Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2011-06-16 15:48 -0500
      Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-14 22:23 +0100
        Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 22:24 +0000
          Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 16:01 -0700
        Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 16:07 -0700
          Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-16 00:26 +0100
            Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 00:17 -0700
              Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-16 09:29 +0100
          Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2011-06-16 15:54 -0500
    Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2011-06-14 19:39 +0100
      Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 23:16 +0100
        Re: Dumb Willy Boaster,: a village idiot! "Clogwog" <clogwog@anon.eu> - 2011-06-15 21:32 +0200
          Re: Dumb Willy Boaster,: a village idiot! Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-15 22:52 +0000
            Re: Dumb Willy Boaster,: a village idiot! "Clogwog" <clogwog@anon.eu> - 2011-06-17 16:12 +0200
  Re: Why Intel will (NOT) fail in mobile "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 13:55 -0400
  Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2011-06-14 19:35 +0100
    Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 14:53 -0400
  Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2011-06-14 19:54 +0100
    Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-14 17:14 -0400
      Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile Clog_-_wog (®) <clog_-_wog@anonimous.eu> - 2011-06-15 17:11 +0200
        Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 21:45 +0200
          Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-15 15:48 -0400
          Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2011-06-16 15:48 -0500

csiph-web