Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.engr.color > #1237

Re: my take on Kodak downfall

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Followups directed to: sci.engr.color, sci.image.processing

Show all headers | View raw

On 19/05/2021 20:46, Savageduck wrote:
> On May 19, 2021, Dale wrote (in article
> <s83les$2qd$2@dont-email.me>):
> 
>> On 2/10/2014 12:28 AM, Dale wrote:
>>> having worked there
> 
> <anchient
>> 
>> this thread isn't from me ...
> 
> Then the mystery, as to why you chose to post this seven year old,
> obviously dead, cross posted screed to sci.engr.color,
> sci.image.processing, rec.photo.darkroom, rec.photo.digital, and
> comp.soft-sys.matlab remains.
> 
To promote his clickbait website perhaps?

Kodak PCD digital scanning service was well ahead of the game at one 
point and Bryce Bayer one shot colour mask designer worked for Kodak.

I recall the Kodak transition to digital cameras as an early adopter. I 
got a massively discounted DC-120 1Mpixel camera "remaindered" when they 
launched the confusingly named DC-210 a couple of months later.

Kodak marketing department really knew how to shoot themselves in the 
foot with both barrels. Almost as bad as IBM with the PS/2 OS/2 debacle.

-- 
Regards,
Martin Brown

Back to sci.engr.color | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: my take on Kodak downfall Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2021-05-19 14:29 -0400
  Re: my take on Kodak downfall Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2021-05-19 12:46 -0700
    Re: my take on Kodak downfall Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> - 2021-05-19 21:26 +0100
      Re: my take on Kodak downfall nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2021-05-19 17:21 -0400
        Re: my take on Kodak downfall Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> - 2021-05-20 08:45 +0100

csiph-web