Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.privacy.anon-server > #98048
| From | cal@nowhere.org |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.computer.security, alt.privacy |
| Subject | The most simple, sensible article on encryption strength you'll ever read |
| Message-ID | <qrtpfkhc8d5427vi2npbdeuti396satek9@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2025-10-25 11:25 -0500 |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
https://medium.com/@drgutteridge/whats-the-deal-with-encryption-strength-is-128-bit-encryption-enough-or-do-you-need-more-3338b53f1e3d Just a bit from the above: 'First thing is, don’t panic. The claims made about the capabilities of code crackers are usually exaggerated. As Edward Snowden said, ‘trust the math.’ Mathematics is a fact. The NSA is constrained by it as much as everyone. So we can take a look at the math and draw some conclusions. One simple fact is that each bit you add to a key doubles the number of possible keys and hence doubles the amount of time it takes to try all possible keys, i.e. a brute force attack."
Back to alt.privacy.anon-server | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
The most simple, sensible article on encryption strength you'll ever read cal@nowhere.org - 2025-10-25 11:25 -0500
Re: The most simple, sensible article on encryption strength you'll ever read D <noreply@mixmin.net> - 2025-10-25 19:27 +0100
Re: The most simple, sensible article on encryption strength you'll ever read Charlie Bum <nobody@domain.invalid> - 2025-10-25 21:54 +0000
Re: The most simple, sensible article on encryption strength you'll ever read Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2025-11-06 03:50 +0100
csiph-web