Re: Named arguments in C

From	Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluemanedhawk@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: Named arguments in C
Date	2024-07-02 19:39 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<pan$1e5a0$ef4a1faf$e6cedebc$3f30bac1@invalid.invalid> (permalink)
References	<utgjh0$21nsq$2@dont-email.me> <uth66l$266da$1@dont-email.me> <uti83u$2ed01$4@dont-email.me> <utjhfn$2r0cr$1@dont-email.me> <v61bbh$1n9ij$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

I searched around a bit, and it seems like a more common way to implement 
named arguments in C is with a pattern like this:

#define f(...) f_impl((struct f_struct){__VA_ARGS__})
void f_impl(struct f_struct { int i, j;  char * k; double l, m, n; } 
f_params)
{
	/* actual code */
}

int main(void)
{
	f(.i = 0, .j = 2, .l = 2.5, .k = "foo", .n = 4.2, .m = 2.5);
}

-- 
Blue-Maned_Hawk│shortens to Hawk│/blu.mɛin.dʰak/│he/him/his/himself/Mr.
blue-maned_hawk.srht.site
Here are some house rules that we highly recommend you don't use.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Named arguments in C Ivan Farlenkov <yo_99@mail.ru> - 2024-07-02 21:53 +0500
  Re: Named arguments in C Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluemanedhawk@invalid.invalid> - 2024-07-02 19:39 +0000
    Re: Named arguments in C Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2024-07-02 20:44 +0100
      Re: Named arguments in C Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluemanedhawk@invalid.invalid> - 2024-07-03 20:16 +0000
        Re: Named arguments in C Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2024-07-04 09:59 +0100
          Re: Named arguments in C Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2024-07-04 09:25 +0000
    Re: Named arguments in C bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-07-02 20:50 +0100
      Re: Named arguments in C Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-07-02 15:01 -0700
      Re: Named arguments in C Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluemanedhawk@invalid.invalid> - 2024-07-03 20:42 +0000
        Re: Named arguments in C bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-07-04 01:12 +0100
          Re: Named arguments in C Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-07-03 19:50 -0700
            Re: Named arguments in C Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2024-07-04 03:15 +0000
      Re: Named arguments in C Opus <ifonly@youknew.org> - 2024-07-04 11:45 +0200
  Re: Named arguments in C Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-03 00:17 +0000
  Re: Named arguments in C Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-07-04 13:12 +0200
    Re: Named arguments in C Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-07-04 15:02 +0300
      Re: Named arguments in C Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-07-04 15:36 +0300
    Re: Named arguments in C bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-07-04 13:49 +0100
      Re: Named arguments in C Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-07-04 15:37 +0200
        Re: Named arguments in C Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-07-04 15:38 +0200
        Re: Named arguments in C bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2024-07-04 14:39 +0100
          Re: Named arguments in C Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-07-04 15:46 +0200

csiph-web