Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #412911
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech |
| Subject | Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution |
| Date | 2017-05-04 21:48 +0100 |
| Organization | ~ |
| Message-ID | <op.yzqerf2fjs98qf@red.lan> (permalink) |
| References | (15 earlier) <D530BFB1.A3692%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yzp9txdojs98qf@red.lan> <D530CC5A.A36C2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yzqbfm2ajs98qf@red.lan> <D530D300.A36FA%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On Thu, 04 May 2017 20:45:52 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 5/4/17, 12:36 PM, in article op.yzqbfm2ajs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, 04 May 2017 20:17:30 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 5/4/17, 12:02 PM, in article op.yzp9txdojs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 04 May 2017 19:23:29 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 5/4/17, 11:10 AM, in article op.yzp7f5sijs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>> Neither do I, of course. If I had, I wouldn't have known it should >>>>>>>>>>> have been "proofread." >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I wasn't castigating him for the error; note the <vbg>. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No offense was taken... and it is rather funny to make a mistake with >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> word "proofread". >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yes, my point exactly. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why do you call it a mistake? Proofread and proof read mean the same. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Using onelook.com I do not see the "proof read" variant, nor doing a >>>>>>> quick >>>>>>> Google search. I accept it as an error. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's just an alternative. What else could it mean? I am reading it again >>>>>> for >>>>>> proof it is correct, so proof read. >>>>> >>>>> Da' fakt dat hit kan B undrestood dose knot mene et iz korekt. >>>> >>>> Correct is meaningless if it works. >>> >>> I think my above sentence is a good example of why that is not the case. :) >> >> I had no trouble reading it. So what was your point? > > One that went over your head. You claimed it was wrong to write like you did, yet I read it perfectly. You failed miserably like you always do. -- Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-04 17:30 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 10:41 -0700
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-04 19:10 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 11:23 -0700
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-04 20:02 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 12:17 -0700
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-04 20:36 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 12:45 -0700
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-04 21:48 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 14:29 -0700
csiph-web