Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #412565
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech |
| Subject | Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. |
| Date | 2017-05-02 20:00 +0100 |
| Organization | ~ |
| Message-ID | <op.yzmkegidjs98qf@red.lan> (permalink) |
| References | (15 earlier) <D519257D.9F551%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yys3z7n3js98qf@red.lan> <D5192F89.9F5C6%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yy4a8ampjs98qf@red.lan> <D5212AF9.A0D91%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Cross-posted to 6 groups.
On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 23:44:57 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/22/17, 3:25 PM, in article op.yy4a8ampjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 22:26:17 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 4/16/17, 2:15 PM, in article op.yys3z7n3js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> I have no issue with a modular tool -- but if the BEST choice he can find >>>>>>> for it does not even have auto-spell checking that is sad. >>>>>> >>>>>> I use it by choice. >>>>> >>>>> Right. And presumably the best choice you can find... I mean why would you >>>>> not use that? Maybe out of habit? But unless there is a good answer it is >>>>> the best choice... and as you admit it has a significant weakness. >>>>> >>>>> Again, not putting you down for it. My Usenet client SUCKS! But it has some >>>>> pretty good abilities in terms of "smart folders" and so I stick with it >>>>> (and there is simply nothing free on macOS I have found which I like). >>>> >>>> Which is why you're both stupid for using rare OSs. >>> >>> Ah, you like to use what is common... no matter what downsides it might >>> have. OK. >> >> The more that people use something, the more effort is put into making it work >> well. >> >> Plus it makes you more compatible with everyone else, and you have the support >> from more other people. > > There are many tasks I do which are done better on macOS than on Windows, in > part because of the software but also because of the tools macOS provides > me. Here is a partial list: > > - Proxy icons Just read up on what those do, and it doesn't make life any simpler. I can do all that stuff easily in Windows without a little icon. > - A Media Browser Built into Windows File Explorer. > - Full screen programs integrating with virtual desktops > - PDF Services > - A system wide color selector which allows for add-ons > - A system wide font manager where you can define sets and more > - Application services > - Renaming and moving and duplicating from within programs > - QuickLook (and its integration with so many programs) > - Saved status indicators > - A visual versioning system - which allows easy copying and pasting > from earlier versions > - A visual backup system that allows a novice to "dig back" into their > history [skipped these, I have some TV to watch] > - Consistent print dialogs > - Consistent save and open dialogs > - Consistent common dialog names and placements and hot keys Consistent in Windows too. > These things are not done perfectly on macOS and the programs that run on > it, but they are generally done well. > >>>> Use windows and have a >>>> huge array of choice for newsreaders and every other program. >>> >>> But that does not mean Windows always has the best-of-class software NOT the >>> best workflows. >> >> More options, more likelihood of the best. > > I use iWork often... nothing like it on Windows that I know of. Looks just like MS Office to me. And whats with the i before everything? It gives an impression that a Mac is a child's toy. Do they still use words like"finder" and "chooser"? > And other > tools on Windows do not, of course, tap into the things I list above or > similar things. They cannot because Windows does not offer most of those > (though with the dialogs I guess it is not too far off). > > But use what you like. That is why *I* like macOS, but it does not mean it > is the best choice for you... nor that it is the best choice for those who > prefer Linux. Good to know at least the basics of each, though, so you can > decide for yourself (assuming you care to). Tried them all, hate everything but Windows. Linux is too geeky, Mac is too childish. -- Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day; teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime; give a man religion and he will die praying for a fish
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-02 20:00 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-02 14:07 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2017-05-02 23:54 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-02 16:01 -0700
csiph-web