Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #411889

Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.

From	"James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech
Subject	Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.
Date	2017-04-28 14:12 +0100
Organization	~
Message-ID	<op.yzepmds6js98qf@red.lan> (permalink)
References	(15 earlier) <D517A457.9F248%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yzdlsepojs98qf@red.lan> <D527C77D.A2100%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yzdot4iqjs98qf@red.lan> <D527D974.A211B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>

Cross-posted to 6 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 01:23:00 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

> On 4/27/17, 4:57 PM, in article op.yzdot4iqjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>
>>>>> They have an outdated file system (which is going to change soon, FINALLY)
>>>>> running of absurdly slow drives (5400 rpm).
>>>>
>>>> Oh come on, don't Macs use SSDs?  Nobody uses mechanical hard disks anymore
>>>> apart from if you need huge storage.
>>>
>>> The iMacs still come, standard, with not just a hard disk but a damned slow
>>> one. SSDs are still too expensive for the type storage you see on desktops,
>>> 1TB and above but they should at least come with Fusion drives. And really a
>>> 5400 rpm on a desktop at that price range is insane.
>>
>> 1TB of SSD is quite feasible in price.
>
> Would love to see a link showing one for a price not too much more than a
> hard drive of that size.

I didn't say it was the same price as a hard disk, I said it was a feasible price.  Since it's a hell of a lot faster, it's worth paying a bit extra.  1TB of SSD is about £220.  1TB of hard disk is about £45.  So only £175 for a HUGE speed increase.

-- 
Smith & Wesson -- the original point and click interface.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-27 23:51 +0100
  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-27 16:06 -0700
    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 00:57 +0100
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-27 17:23 -0700
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 14:12 +0100
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 09:47 -0700
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 17:51 +0100
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 11:07 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 19:37 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 12:19 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 20:44 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 12:56 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-28 21:18 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-28 14:19 -0700

csiph-web