Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #408579
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech |
| Subject | Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution |
| Date | 2017-04-15 22:47 +0100 |
| Organization | ~ |
| Message-ID | <op.yyras101js98qf@red.lan> (permalink) |
| References | (15 earlier) <2017041121411958780-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <op.yyq2iog9js98qf@red.lan> <2017041513490814915-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <op.yyq8enxtjs98qf@red.lan> <150420171703161883%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 22:03:16 +0100, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <op.yyq8enxtjs98qf@red.lan>, James Wilkinson Sword > <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> >> > So whatever you printed was hardly at "max >> > quality" regardless of the number of inks used, >> >> It certainly was, the printer was set to the highest setting of 5. > > meaningless. > > even shitty printers have 'high quality' settings. I said it was "max quality" which it was. It may not be the best in the world, but it's still max for that printer. So when (whoever you snipped the name of) wrote "hardly at max quality", he was wrong. >> > or the time it took >> > your printer to grind out a print. I would never use that particular >> > file for printing, and I was not about to post a link to a 73MB 4288 x >> > 2848 PSD which is what I have printed from. >> >> So why not link to something that's a decent test? I've got broadband you know, >> I can download a large image.... > > ...but not even the smallest clue. And you're making a very poor attempt to correct it. You come up with information then provide links to poor examples. -- A Smith and Wesson beats four Aces.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 19:48 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-15 13:49 -0700
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 21:55 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 17:03 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 22:47 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 19:10 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-15 14:55 -0700
csiph-web