Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #408536
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech |
| Subject | Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution |
| Date | 2017-04-15 19:06 +0100 |
| Organization | ~ |
| Message-ID | <op.yyq0lri0js98qf@red.lan> (permalink) |
| References | (15 earlier) <2017041115295799247-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <op.yyjybkeajs98qf@red.lan> <2017041115501412991-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <op.yyj2hlsajs98qf@red.lan> <201704111720307730-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 01:20:30 +0100, wrote: > On 2017-04-12 00:04:23 +0000, "James Wilkinson Sword" > <imvalid@somewear.com> said: > >> On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 23:50:14 +0100, wrote: >>> On 2017-04-11 22:34:22 +0000, "James Wilkinson Sword" >>> <imvalid@somewear.com> said: >>>> On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 23:29:57 +0100, wrote: >>>>> On 2017-04-11 22:07:10 +0000, "James Wilkinson Sword" >>>>> <imvalid@somewear.com> said: >>>>>> On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 22:43:47 +0100, wrote: >>>>>>> On 2017-04-11 21:23:38 +0000, "James Wilkinson Sword" >>>>>>> <imvalid@somewear.com> said: >>>>>>>> On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 21:12:54 +0100, Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 04/10/2017 07:09 PM, nospam wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [snip] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> it's cyan. it's not light blue. that's why it's called cyan ink and not >>>>>>>>>> light blue ink. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I used to have a printer with SIX ink cartridges. IIRC they were cyan, >>>>>>>>> light cyan, magenta, light magenta, yellow, black. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Mine has NO ink cartridges. You actually buy a new little plastic >>>>>>>> container all the time? I have huge tanks sat on the desk beside it. >>>>>>>> When one looks a bit low, I pour some in from a bottle. Equivalent to >>>>>>>> 3p (4c) a cartridge. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So you don't give a damn when it comes to color printing? >>>>>> >>>>>> Why would having the ink in a different container change the colour output?! >>>>>> >>>>>>> For many good photo printers you will usually find 6 or more inks. My >>>>>>> Epson uses 8 UltraChrome K3 inks; Photo Black, Light Black, Light Light >>>>>>> Black, Yellow, Vivid Magenta, Vivid Light Magenta, Cyan, Light Cyan, >>>>>>> and when using matte paper Photo Black is exchanged for Matte Black. >>>>>>> The newer photo printers user 10 tanks. >>>>>> >>>>>> And it makes no difference at all to the output. All you need is >>>>>> decent paper and fine ink nozzles. >>>>> >>>>> ...and a color managed workflow with a properly calibrated system. >>>> >>>> Printer manufacturers must love you. >>> >>> ...and yet I can produce superb color prints from my dedicated Epson >>> photo printer, and fairly good color prints from my general purpose >>> Epson "all-in-one" printer. >>> >>> What do you use for your photo prints? >> >> An Epson with 4 colours, on decent paper, in the mode with the highest >> resolution. They look just like photos from a 35mm camera done in a >> professional lab. > > An Epson 4 color printer is going to give you acceptable, sometimes > very good color prints, but in no way the best photo reproduction. My > general document and occasional photo printer is an Epson XP-610, a 4 > color printer capable of producing good photo prints no larger than > 8"x10". However, there is no comparison when I compare what it produces > against my 8 color photo printer, especially when using high quality > papers, and matching printer/paper specific icc profiles in my color > managed workflow. If I set mine to maximum quality (which takes fucking ages) it's perfect quality. > As for making prints look just like those from a 35mm camera, that sort > of degradation is easily done with software. I take it you didn't have a professional SLR 35mm camera. -- The little boat gently drifted across the pond exactly the way a bowling ball wouldn't.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 19:06 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 14:45 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-15 13:22 -0700
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 21:52 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-15 14:50 -0700
csiph-web