Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #348036

Re: Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani

From	Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani
Date	2016-03-29 19:50 +0200
Organization	DNLA GmbH
Message-ID	<ndef2v$a4$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <3382742e-7219-4aa1-93cd-d43a78cb6760@googlegroups.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Mar.27{9.21A.Seattle.2016}> <nd9ru3$751$1@dont-email.me> <ng9ifb57orabua1vr6grldtg8k6m91djvq@4ax.com> <nde2s8$ek6$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

DFS wrote:

> On 3/28/2016 8:44 AM, shitv wrote:
> 
>> "Testing is how you know if the code works or not, not compile-time
>> warnings."  -  Jeff Relf (the trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel" supports
>> Relf, on this issue)
> 
> 
> ALL non-idiots support the use of testing over compile-time warnings to
> determine if the code functions correctly.
> 
> You're one of the few idiots who thinks otherwise.
> 

Testing is usually impossible to find all the possible errors. You can't 
think of and build testcases for all possible combinations.

Additionally, compile time warnings are the first step. You look up *every* 
occurence of warnings and scrutinize the code to fond the source of the 
warning, then you remove the reason for the warning (and not the warning 
itself)

You are truly an idiot if you think otherwise. But then you are just a lowly 
VB coder. You mindlessly click on blocks to somehow connect them to somehow 
achieve a result which remotely resembles the real one

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

I like taking cock up my ass "7" <idiot@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-03-27 01:51 +0100
  Re: I like taking cock up my ass Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-03-27 15:31 +0000
    Re: I like taking cock up my ass Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 09:01 -0700
      Eternal-September  Motzarella  Aioe  Dizum  Albasani Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-27 09:21 -0700
        Re: Eternal-September  Motzarella  Aioe  Dizum  Albasani Nobody <nobody@nowhere.net> - 2016-03-27 12:25 -0400
        Re: Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-27 12:31 -0400
          Re: Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani Nobody <nobody@nowhere.net> - 2016-03-27 12:39 -0400
          Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-27 09:51 -0700
            Re: Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-27 13:04 -0400
              Usenet, eMail, CraigsList, WikiPedia, etc. allow <PRE>. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-27 10:13 -0700
                Re: Usenet, eMail, CraigsList, WikiPedia, etc. allow <PRE>. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-27 18:50 +0000
                Re: Usenet, eMail, CraigsList, WikiPedia, etc. allow <PRE>. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 00:55 -0400
                Re: Usenet, eMail, CraigsList, WikiPedia, etc. allow <PRE>. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-28 05:57 +0000
        Re: Eternal-September  Motzarella  Aioe  Dizum  Albasani tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-03-27 19:53 -0400
          Re: Eternal-September  Motzarella  Aioe  Dizum  Albasani chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-28 07:23 -0500
        Re: Eternal-September  Motzarella  Aioe  Dizum  Albasani Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-03-28 01:59 +0200
          Re: Eternal-September  Motzarella  Aioe  Dizum  Albasani chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-28 07:44 -0500
            My code only does what _I_ want, not what "you" want. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-28 06:15 -0700
            My code only does what _I_ want, not what "you" want. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-28 06:17 -0700
              Re: My code only does what _I_ want, not what "you" want. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-03-28 19:33 +0000
              Re: My code only does what _I_ want, not what "you" want. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-03-28 23:41 +0200
                How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-28 14:52 -0700
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Somebody <somebody@nowhere.net> - 2016-03-28 18:01 -0400
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-03-29 00:25 +0200
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-03-28 18:30 -0400
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-03-29 00:50 +0200
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Somebody <somebody@nowhere.net> - 2016-03-28 18:54 -0400
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-03-28 21:11 -0400
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-03-29 15:38 +0200
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-29 10:09 -0400
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-03-29 19:54 +0200
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-29 14:51 -0400
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-03-29 22:04 +0200
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-03-29 20:30 +0000
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-03-29 13:59 -0700
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-03-29 23:57 +0200
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-03-29 18:23 -0700
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-29 16:50 -0500
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-29 19:23 -0400
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-03-30 00:42 +0000
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-30 10:52 -0400
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-03-30 16:26 +0000
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-03-29 20:38 -0400
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-30 06:59 -0500
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-03-30 11:46 -0400
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-30 11:53 -0400
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-03-29 12:05 -0700
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-03-29 12:06 -0700
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-03-28 21:10 -0400
                Re: How could defining a variable, and not using it, be a problem ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-30 14:13 -0400
                Peter Kohlmann has brain damage, I think. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-28 15:53 -0700
                Re: Peter Kohlmann has brain damage, I think. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-03-28 23:32 +0000
                Re: My code only does what _I_ want, not what "you" want. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-29 07:24 -0500
            Re: Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-29 10:21 -0400
              Re: Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-03-29 19:50 +0200
                Re: Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-29 13:12 -0500
                *Spank*  Dumfsck and Kreep chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-29 14:29 -0500
                Re: *Spank*  Dumfsck and Kreep owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-03-29 19:36 +0000
                Re: *Spank* Dumfsck and Kreep DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-29 15:42 -0400
                Re: Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-29 15:59 -0400
                Re: Eternal-September Motzarella Aioe Dizum Albasani DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-30 10:51 -0400
    Re: I like taking cock up my ass "Delgato" <delgato@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 03:01 +0200

csiph-web