Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #104655
| From | Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: hasattr() or "x in y"? |
| Date | 2016-03-11 22:30 +0000 |
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <nbvgum$5v6$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <nbve7c$nbo$1@dont-email.me> <nbvf69$105$1@reader1.panix.com> <nbvg8a$vcv$1@dont-email.me> |
On 2016-03-11, Charles T. Smith <cts.private.yahoo@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 22:00:41 +0000, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> Since they behave differently, perhaps the question ought to be "which
>> does what you want to do?"
>
> For parsed msgs, I had this:
>
> elif hasattr (msg.msgBody, 'request'):
>
> It occurred to me that this was less abstruse:
>
> elif 'request' in msg.msgBody:
If you want to know if msg.msgBody has an attribute named 'request'
then use hasattr().
If you want to know if msg.msgBody "contains"[1] the string 'request'
then use "in".
_They're_two_different_things_
[1] for some definition of "contains" that depends on the type of
msg.msgBody.
> and by the way, how would you do that with duck-typing?
Do WHAT?
> If I were doing this anew, I probably use a dictionary of functors,
> but that's not an option anymore.
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! Were these parsnips
at CORRECTLY MARINATED in
gmail.com TACO SAUCE?
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
hasattr() or "x in y"? "Charles T. Smith" <cts.private.yahoo@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 21:44 +0000
Re: hasattr() or "x in y"? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 08:55 +1100
Re: hasattr() or "x in y"? "Charles T. Smith" <cts.private.yahoo@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 21:53 +0000
Re: hasattr() or "x in y"? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 09:04 +1100
Re: hasattr() or "x in y"? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-11 22:05 +0000
Re: hasattr() or "x in y"? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-11 22:00 +0000
Re: hasattr() or "x in y"? "Charles T. Smith" <cts.private.yahoo@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 22:18 +0000
Re: hasattr() or "x in y"? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-11 22:30 +0000
csiph-web