Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #62756

Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed)

From Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups alt.comp.lang.borland-delphi, alt.comp.lang.c, att.lang.c++, comp.lang.c, comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed)
Date 2015-05-28 22:13 +0000
Organization PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID <mk83tk$2qq$4@reader1.panix.com> (permalink)
References <3794b$55678d83$5419aafe$56138@news.ziggo.nl> <2ac80$55678eb8$5419aafe$56778@news.ziggo.nl> <c8624$556791a3$5419aafe$58453@news.ziggo.nl> <c48b1$556791ee$5419aafe$58588@news.ziggo.nl>

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 2015-05-28, Skybuck Flying <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> wrote:

> However I can already see I am not happy with this video solution.
>
> I have 3 true outputs, and only 1 false output.
>
> That would require a lot of logic.
>
> I guess I can turn it around and negate the whole thing... and focus on the 
> false output.

Don't they teach Karnaugh mapping any more?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karnaugh_map

-- 
Grant Edwards               grant.b.edwards        Yow! I want the presidency
                                  at               so bad I can already taste
                              gmail.com            the hors d'oeuvres.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-28 23:50 +0200
  Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-28 23:55 +0200
    Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 00:07 +0200
      Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 00:08 +0200
        Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 00:12 +0200
          Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 04:45 +0200
            Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 04:56 +0200
        Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 22:13 +0000
          Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 22:15 +0000
  Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 22:01 +0000
    Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 22:11 +0000
  Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. donalhambra@gmail.com - 2015-05-28 15:02 -0700
    Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Morris Dovey <mrdovey@iedu.com> - 2015-05-28 18:16 -0500
      Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. David Thompson <dave.thompson2@verizon.net> - 2015-06-21 12:46 -0400
        Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Morris Dovey <mrdovey@iedu.com> - 2015-06-21 14:48 -0500
  Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2015-05-28 18:39 -0400
    Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-05-28 23:56 +0100
      Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2015-05-28 19:06 -0400
        Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-05-29 00:24 +0100
          Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2015-05-28 19:36 -0400
  Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Paul <nospam@needed.com> - 2015-05-28 19:21 -0400
  Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Rosario19 <Ros@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-29 07:49 +0200
    Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Rosario19 <Ros@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-29 07:52 +0200
  Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. M Philbrook <jamie_ka1lpa@charter.net> - 2015-05-29 19:07 -0400

csiph-web