Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.software.year-2000 > #94

Re: A signed 32-bit overflow?

From bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman)
Newsgroups comp.software.year-2000
Subject Re: A signed 32-bit overflow?
Date 2015-05-03 01:18 +0000
Organization DNA + Sunlight
Message-ID <mi3t0g$7ge$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink)
References <D+RI09GJjMRVFwFg@invalid.uk.co.demon.merlyn.invalid>

Show all headers | View raw


Dr J R Stockton  <reply1500@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> wrote:
><http://phys.org/news/2015-05-faa-airworthiness-issued-power-loss.html>
>
>Observe that 2^31 centiseconds = 248.55 days - don't forget to reboot
>your 787.

Good get, Dr. J.

    --bks

Back to comp.software.year-2000 | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

A signed 32-bit overflow? Dr J R Stockton <reply1500@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2015-05-02 13:53 +0100
  Re: A signed 32-bit overflow? bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) - 2015-05-03 01:18 +0000

csiph-web