Re: How well do you know Python?

From	Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: How well do you know Python?
Date	2016-07-05 13:33 +0200
Organization	None
Message-ID	<mailman.94.1467718436.2295.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References	<CAPTjJmoZobGYDh8jWDPPWQqoN-gid+-HUp9-dtKX_Vp=BgHc+w@mail.gmail.com> <nlfrhl$bq1$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAPTjJmqn_asKVPpLwTQFWCSXe3w6hxQdXxXnfznZ6ucJO0yrsw@mail.gmail.com> <nlg5ur$i9m$1@ger.gmane.org>

Show all headers | View raw

Chris Angelico wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> wrote:
>> What will
>>
>> $ cat foo.py
>> import foo
>> class A: pass
>> print(isinstance(foo.A(), A))
>> $ python -c 'import foo'
>> ...
>> $ python foo.py
>> ...
>>
>> print?
> 
> I refuse to play around with isinstance and old-style classes.
> Particularly when circular imports are involved. Run this under Python
> 3 and/or explicitly subclass object, and then I'd consider it. :)

The intended lesson was that there may be two distinct classes

__main__.A and foo.A

Even though not just classes, but every object created in the script is 
affected this seems to cause the most subtle bugs.

Maybe the setup can be simplified or the question rephrased to make this 
clearer.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: How well do you know Python? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-07-05 13:33 +0200

csiph-web