Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #70276

Re: random.seed question (not reproducing same sequence)

Show all headers | View raw

Nick Mellor wrote:

> Hi guys,
> 
> (Python 2.7, Windows 7 64-bit)
> 
> Here's a bit of code stress-testing a method addUpdate_special_to_cart.
> The test adds and updates random "specials" (multiple products bundled at
> an advantageous price) of various sizes to thousands of shopping carts,
> then restocks the whole darn lot. The test passes if the stock level
> afterwards is the same as it was before executing the code for all
> products.
> 
> addUpdate_special_to_cart is working perfectly. But the test isn't.
> 
> The test iterates over the same code twice, once with special_qty==4, once
> with special_qty==0, reseeding the Python random module number generator
> to a fixed seed (a string) between the iterations. special_qty==0 removes
> the special and restocks the products. The test relies on precisely the
> same random number sequence on both runs.
> 
> Can you think of a reason why the random number generator should fall out
> of sync between the two iterations? Because that's what's happening by the
> look of it: occasionally products are returned to the wrong stockbin. No
> "random" module method is used anywhere else while this code is executing.
> 
> When I assign something non-random to the stockbin parameter, the test
> passes.
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> 
> 
> Nick
> 
> for qty in [4, 0]:
>                 random.seed(seed)
>                 for cart in range(test_size):
>                     for special in range(randrange(3)):
>                         s.addUpdate_special_to_cart(cart=cart,
>                         stockbin=randrange(test_size),
>                                                     
special_id=randrange(test_size),
>                                                     special_qty=qty,
>                                                     
products=[(random.choice(PRODUCTS),
>                                                     
random.choice(range(10)))
>                                                         for r in
>                                                         
range(randrange(7))])

An exotic option: I notice that randrange() is the only random function not 
qualified with the module name. If you are using a fancy auto-reloading web 
framework things can get out of sync:

>>> import random
>>> from random import randrange
>>> random.seed(42)
>>> [randrange(10) for _ in range(5)]
[6, 0, 2, 2, 7]
>>> random.seed(42)
>>> [randrange(10) for _ in range(5)]
[6, 0, 2, 2, 7]
>>> reload(random)
<module 'random' from '/usr/lib/python2.7/random.pyc'>
>>> random.seed(42)
>>> [randrange(10) for _ in range(5)]
[6, 8, 0, 4, 0]

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

random.seed question (not reproducing same sequence) Nick Mellor <thebalancepro@gmail.com> - 2014-04-15 08:54 -0700
  Re: random.seed question (not reproducing same sequence) John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2014-04-15 16:21 +0000
    Re: random.seed question (not reproducing same sequence) Nick Mellor <thebalancepro@gmail.com> - 2014-04-15 18:05 -0700
      Re: random.seed question (not reproducing same sequence) John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2014-04-16 04:32 +0000
  Re: random.seed question (not reproducing same sequence) Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2014-04-15 12:36 -0400
  Re: random.seed question (not reproducing same sequence) Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-04-15 19:34 +0200
  Re: random.seed question (not reproducing same sequence) Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2014-04-15 17:07 -0700
  Re: random.seed question (not reproducing same sequence) Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2014-04-15 20:48 -0400

csiph-web