Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15407
| From | Ilkka Virta <itvirta@iki.fi> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | Re: Wrong command option in the manual examples |
| Date | 2019-09-23 12:29 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.844.1569230968.2190.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | <CAD0rTC6EHd5w5A6kuD850mLzu+V_EJXQyoZ=amQcF9TktTSEJA@mail.gmail.com> <38052651-6d67-6107-660c-707ca39ee00c@case.edu> <59cf49b0-1292-b752-4fe8-8928fd558ebf@iki.fi> |
On 22.9. 21:15, Chet Ramey wrote: > On 9/20/19 10:24 PM, hk wrote: > >> Bash Version: 5.0 >> Patch Level: 0 >> Release Status: release >> >> Description: >> On the section 3.2.6(GNU Parallel, page 16 in the pdf) of Bash >> Reference Manual. The manual uses `find' command to illustrate >> possible use cases of `parallel' as examples. but the option `-depth' >> does not accept any argument, I think it means `-maxdepth` option >> instead. > > -depth n > True if the depth of the file relative to the starting point of > the traversal is n. > > It's not in POSIX, and maybe GNU find doesn't implement it. That seems to raise a question. Isn't Bash a GNU project? Would it be prudent to use other GNU tools in examples, if standard POSIX features aren't sufficient? I can see that FreeBSD find has '-depth n' (as well the standard '-depth', somewhat confusingly) but should the reader of the manual be assumed to know the options supported by BSD utilities? -- Ilkka Virta / itvirta@iki.fi
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Wrong command option in the manual examples Ilkka Virta <itvirta@iki.fi> - 2019-09-23 12:29 +0300
csiph-web