Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #95953
| References | <19ca6361-95fe-4a5d-84d6-c72d7941745c@googlegroups.com> <mailman.70.1441294042.8327.python-list@python.org> <53c5301c-2833-446f-a7d1-6c0ef9314928@googlegroups.com> <mailman.75.1441295521.8327.python-list@python.org> <652bbe97-aef5-41dc-8f4c-cfa47bcfd120@googlegroups.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-04 02:11 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: continue vs. pass in this IO reading and writing |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.80.1441296690.8327.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:57 AM, kbtyo <ahlusar.ahluwalia@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have used CSV and collections. For some reason when I apply this algorithm, all of my files are not added (the output is ridiculously small considering how much goes in - think KB output vs MB input):
>
> from glob import iglob
> import csv
> from collections import OrderedDict
>
> files = sorted(iglob('*.csv'))
> header = OrderedDict()
> data = []
>
> for filename in files:
> with open(filename, 'r') as fin:
> csvin = csv.DictReader(fin)
> header.update(OrderedDict.fromkeys(csvin.fieldnames))
> data.append(next(csvin))
>
> with open('output_filename_version2.csv', 'w') as fout:
> csvout = csv.DictWriter(fout, fieldnames=list(header))
> csvout.writeheader()
> csvout.writerows(data)
You're collecting up just one row from each file. Since you say your
input is measured in MB (not GB or anything bigger), the simplest
approach is probably fine: instead of "data.append(next(csvin))", just
use "data.extend(csvin)", which should grab them all. That'll store
all your input data in memory, which should be fine if it's only a few
meg, and probably not a problem for anything under a few hundred meg.
ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
continue vs. pass in this IO reading and writing kbtyo <ahlusar.ahluwalia@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 08:05 -0700
Re: continue vs. pass in this IO reading and writing Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 01:27 +1000
Re: continue vs. pass in this IO reading and writing kbtyo <ahlusar.ahluwalia@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 08:38 -0700
Re: continue vs. pass in this IO reading and writing Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 01:51 +1000
Re: continue vs. pass in this IO reading and writing kbtyo <ahlusar.ahluwalia@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 08:57 -0700
Re: continue vs. pass in this IO reading and writing Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 02:11 +1000
Re: continue vs. pass in this IO reading and writing kbtyo <ahlusar.ahluwalia@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 09:35 -0700
Re: continue vs. pass in this IO reading and writing kbtyo <ahlusar.ahluwalia@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 08:49 -0700
Re: continue vs. pass in this IO reading and writing Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-09-03 12:05 -0400
Re: continue vs. pass in this IO reading and writing Luca Menegotto <otlucaDELETE@DELETEyahoo.it> - 2015-09-03 18:37 +0200
csiph-web