Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #11742
| From | Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | Re: Bash crash |
| Date | 2015-10-22 08:33 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.784.1445517194.7904.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | <C2FB93DF99E5FD43B0413EDB326AE2AA2B942E8F@ESGSCMB107.ericsson.se> <56264216.2060606@case.edu> <C2FB93DF99E5FD43B0413EDB326AE2AA2B94421D@ESGSCMB107.ericsson.se> <CAP=cN8n2FKQB+OcB-VWtCcm9A-z5VueUA0XS0F3DgEE3iobUQw@mail.gmail.com> <C2FB93DF99E5FD43B0413EDB326AE2AA2B9445C1@ESGSCMB107.ericsson.se> |
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 02:39:43AM +0000, Kai Wang X wrote:
> The process named "com" launched by script command "com.sh start". Pls refer to the attached files. It looks easy, doesn't it?
It looks like a horrible mish-mash of legacy Bourne shell syntax,
edited later by another person using certain post-Bourne shell constructs
(note the inconsistent use of test and [ commands), with quoting failures
thrown in for good measure (lots of [ -e ${foo} ] commands).
I cringed at the `expr` all over the place, and stopped reading halfway
through.
The shebang is #!/bin/sh and it's using half-Bourne half-POSIX code, so
if you suspect a bug in bash, why not just let it run under some other
shell? /bin/sh does not link to bash on most operating systems. Not
even on all of the Linux-based operating systems.
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: Bash crash Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2015-10-22 08:33 -0400
csiph-web