Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #89526
| References | <87h9s1zoap.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <mhlh2f$plv$2@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.49.1430167261.3680.python-list@python.org> <87y4lbxyc2.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> |
|---|---|
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Date | 2015-04-29 01:02 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Wrote a memoize function: I do not mind feedback |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.74.1430291009.3680.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:06 AM, Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> wrote:
> Op Monday 27 Apr 2015 22:35 CEST schreef Albert-Jan Roskam:
>> def some_func(arg, _memoize={}):
>> try:
>> return _memoize[arg]
>> except KeyError:
>> result = some_expensive_operation(arg)
>> _memoize[arg] = result
>> return result
>
> That is in a way the same as what I do, except I do not use an
> exception. Iunderstand it is not as expensive as it was anymore, but I
> do not like to use an exception (when not necessary).
It's useful to keep in mind which case it is that you're trying to
optimize. The expensive case for exceptions is when one actually gets
raised. A try that doesn't raise an exception is pretty cheap,
probably cheaper than looking up the key in the dict twice as the code
you linked does. Compare:
>>> from timeit import timeit
>>> timeit("if x in y: y[x]", setup="x = 1; y = {1: 2}")
0.2224265851985905
>>> timeit("""
... try:
... y[x]
... except KeyError:
... pass
... """, setup="x = 1; y = {1: 2}")
0.15237198271520924
On the other hand, if the KeyError does get raised, then it will be
more expensive, but that would already be the expensive case for
memoized function, and if that computation isn't significantly more
expensive than the cost of raising an exception, then it probably
isn't worth memoizing in the first place.
Regardless of which way you write it, this sort of micro-optimization
hardly ever matters, and in the situations where it does matter,
you'll gain much more performance by rewriting in C than by
obsessively tuning your Python code.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Wrote a memoize function: I do not mind feedback Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-27 15:35 +0200
Re: Wrote a memoize function: I do not mind feedback Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-04-27 16:28 +0200
Re: Wrote a memoize function: I do not mind feedback Albert-Jan Roskam <fomcl@yahoo.com> - 2015-04-27 20:35 +0000
Re: Wrote a memoize function: I do not mind feedback Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-29 08:06 +0200
Re: Wrote a memoize function: I do not mind feedback Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-04-29 01:02 -0600
Re: Wrote a memoize function: I do not mind feedback Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-29 10:04 +0200
Re: Wrote a memoize function: I do not mind feedback Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-04-29 09:58 +0100
Re: Wrote a memoize function: I do not mind feedback Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-04-29 13:52 +0200
csiph-web