Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #21626

Re: Style question (Poll)

Show all headers | View raw

On 3/14/2012 4:49 PM, Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
> On 14 March 2012 20:37, Croepha<croepha@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> Which is preferred:
>>
>> for value in list:
>>   if not value is another_value:
>>     value.do_something()
>>     break

Do you really mean 'is' or '=='?

If you mean x is not y, write it that way.
'not x is y' can be misread and misunderstood, depending on whether
the 'is' is true or not.

 >>> not 1 is 1
False
 >>> not (1 is 1)
False
 >>> (not 1) is 1
False

Does not matter how read.

 >>> not (1 is 0)
True
 >>> (not 1) is 0
False
 >>> not 1 is 0
True

Does matter how read.

>> if list and not list[0] is another_value:
>>   list[0].do_something()

Or
try:
   value = mylist[0]
   if value is not another_value: value.dosomething
except IndexError:
   pass

I would not do this in this case of index 0, but if the index were a 
complicated expression or expensive function call, making 'if list' an 
inadequate test, I might.

> Hard to say, since they don't do the same thing :)
>
> I suspect you meant:
>
> for value in list:
>     if not value is another_value:
>         value.do_something()
>     break
>
> I always feel uncomfortable with this because it's misleading: a loop
> that never loops.

I agree. Please do not do this in public ;-).

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Style question (Poll) Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-03-14 17:16 -0400
  Re: Style question (Poll) Jon Clements <joncle@googlemail.com> - 2012-03-15 10:13 -0700
  Re: Style question (Poll) Jon Clements <joncle@googlemail.com> - 2012-03-15 10:13 -0700

csiph-web