Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #34518
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-08 19:07 -0800 |
| References | (2 earlier) <k9p32p$nek$1@dont-email.me> <50c01fe2$0$21853$c3e8da3$76491128@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.549.1354783761.29569.python-list@python.org> <50c085e5$0$29994$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.555.1354796060.29569.python-list@python.org> |
| Subject | Re: Confused compare function :) |
| From | Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com> |
| Message-ID | <mailman.644.1355027681.29569.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Thursday, 6 December 2012 17:44:17 UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Steven D'Aprano > > <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote: > > > Not so. Which one is faster will depend on how often you expect to fail. > > > If the keys are nearly always present, then: > > > > > > try: > > > do_stuff(mydict[k]) > > > except KeyError: > > > pass > > > > > > will be faster. Setting up a try block is very fast, about as fast as > > > "pass", and faster than "if k in mydict". > > > > > > But if the key is often missing, then catching the exception will be > > > slow, and the "if k in mydict" version may be faster. It depends on how > > > often the key is missing. > > > > > > > Setting up the try/except is a constant time cost, while the > > duplicated search for k inside the dictionary might depend on various > > other factors. In the specific case of a Python dictionary, the > > membership check is fairly cheap (assuming you're not the subject of a > > hash collision attack - Py3.3 makes that a safe assumption), but if > > you were about to execute a program and wanted to first find out if it > > existed, that extra check could be ridiculously expensive, eg if the > > path takes you on a network drive - or, worse, on multiple network > > drives, which I have had occasion to do! > > > > ChrisA Not really. I remember a bug saying that only 256 hashes were required of known texts and then the randomization becomes useless.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Confused compare function :) Bruno Dupuis <python.ml.bruno.dupuis@lisael.org> - 2012-12-06 01:19 +0100
Re: Confused compare function :) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-12-06 00:42 +0000
Re: Confused compare function :) Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-12-06 13:41 -0500
Re: Confused compare function :) Anatoli Hristov <tolidtm@gmail.com> - 2012-12-06 19:55 +0100
Re: Confused compare function :) Rotwang <sg552@hotmail.co.uk> - 2012-12-06 03:22 +0000
Re: Confused compare function :) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-12-06 04:32 +0000
Re: Confused compare function :) Bruno Dupuis <python.ml.bruno.dupuis@lisael.org> - 2012-12-06 09:49 +0100
Re: Confused compare function :) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-12-06 11:47 +0000
Re: Confused compare function :) peter <pjmakey2@gmail.com> - 2012-12-06 08:55 -0300
Re: Confused compare function :) Hans Mulder <hansmu@xs4all.nl> - 2012-12-06 14:32 +0100
Re: Confused compare function :) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-12-07 00:47 +1100
Re: Confused compare function :) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-12-06 23:14 +1100
Re: Confused compare function :) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-12-07 22:16 +0000
Re: Confused compare function :) Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-12-08 02:01 -0500
Re: Confused compare function :) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-12-08 18:17 +1100
Re: Confused compare function :) MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-12-08 17:50 +0000
Re: Confused compare function :) Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com> - 2012-12-08 19:07 -0800
Re: Confused compare function :) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-12-09 14:22 +1100
Re: Confused compare function :) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-12-09 07:39 +0000
Re: Confused compare function :) Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com> - 2012-12-08 19:07 -0800
Re: Confused compare function :) Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2012-12-06 13:51 +0000
Re: Confused compare function :) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-12-07 02:55 +0000
Re: Confused compare function :) Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2012-12-07 16:40 +0000
Re: Confused compare function :) Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2012-12-06 14:33 +0100
Re: Confused compare function :) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-12-07 00:58 +1100
Re: Confused compare function :) Hans Mulder <hansmu@xs4all.nl> - 2012-12-06 15:21 +0100
Re: Confused compare function :) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-12-07 01:28 +1100
Re: Confused compare function :) Anatoli Hristov <tolidtm@gmail.com> - 2012-12-06 15:22 +0100
Re: Confused compare function :) Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-12-06 09:40 -0500
Re: Confused compare function :) peter <pjmakey2@gmail.com> - 2012-12-06 11:46 -0300
Re: Confused compare function :) Anatoli Hristov <tolidtm@gmail.com> - 2012-12-06 17:16 +0100
Re: Confused compare function :) Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-06 16:52 +0000
Re: Confused compare function :) Anatoli Hristov <tolidtm@gmail.com> - 2012-12-06 18:08 +0100
Re: Confused compare function :) MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-12-06 17:10 +0000
Re: Confused compare function :) Anatoli Hristov <tolidtm@gmail.com> - 2012-12-06 18:31 +0100
Re: Confused compare function :) MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-12-06 17:52 +0000
Re: Confused compare function :) Anatoli Hristov <tolidtm@gmail.com> - 2012-12-06 19:25 +0100
Re: Confused compare function :) Anatoli Hristov <tolidtm@gmail.com> - 2012-12-07 14:36 +0100
Re: Confused compare function :) Rotwang <sg552@hotmail.co.uk> - 2012-12-06 19:24 +0000
Re: Confused compare function :) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-12-06 20:34 +1100
Re: Confused compare function :) Rotwang <sg552@hotmail.co.uk> - 2012-12-06 19:25 +0000
csiph-web