Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #51436
| References | <roy-8C60F5.15590428072013@news.panix.com> <kt51t3$r61$1@ger.gmane.org> |
|---|---|
| From | Joshua Landau <joshua@landau.ws> |
| Date | 2013-07-29 12:49 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: collections.Counter surprisingly slow |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5226.1375098641.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 29 July 2013 07:25, Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> wrote: > 28.07.13 22:59, Roy Smith написав(ла): > > The input is an 8.8 Mbyte file containing about 570,000 lines (11,000 >> unique strings). >> > > Repeat you tests with totally unique lines. Counter is about ½ the speed of defaultdict in that case (as opposed to ⅓). > The full profiler dump is at the end of this message, but the gist of >> it is: >> > > Profiler affects execution time. In particular it slowdown Counter > implementation which uses more function calls. For real world measurement > use different approach. Doing some re-times, it seems that his originals for defaultdict, exception and Counter were about right. I haven't timed the other. > Why is count() [i.e. collections.Counter] so slow? >> > > Feel free to contribute a patch which fixes this "wart". Note that Counter > shouldn't be slowdowned on mostly unique data. I find it hard to agree that counter should be optimised for the unique-data case, as surely it's much more oft used when there's a point to counting? Also, couldn't Counter just extend from defaultdict?
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
collections.Counter surprisingly slow Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-07-28 15:59 -0400
Re: collections.Counter surprisingly slow Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-07-28 20:51 +0000
Re: collections.Counter surprisingly slow Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-07-28 17:57 -0400
Re: collections.Counter surprisingly slow Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2013-07-29 13:46 +0200
Re: collections.Counter surprisingly slow Joshua Landau <joshua@landau.ws> - 2013-07-29 13:07 +0100
Re: collections.Counter surprisingly slow Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2013-07-29 09:25 +0300
Re: collections.Counter surprisingly slow Joshua Landau <joshua@landau.ws> - 2013-07-29 12:49 +0100
Re: collections.Counter surprisingly slow Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-07-29 11:19 -0600
Re: collections.Counter surprisingly slow Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2013-07-29 22:37 +0300
Re: collections.Counter surprisingly slow Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2013-07-30 08:39 +0200
Re: collections.Counter surprisingly slow Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2013-07-30 08:51 +0200
Re: collections.Counter surprisingly slow Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2013-07-30 16:04 +0300
csiph-web