Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #53525
| Date | 2013-09-02 14:59 -0400 |
|---|---|
| From | Tommy Vee <vitaletom1@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Simplex Algorithm |
| References | <1PRUt.242963$ZD2.40442@fx19.iad> <mailman.477.1378115748.19984.python-list@python.org> <5224A963.4040304@xxxxxx.xxx> <mailman.496.1378136639.19984.python-list@python.org> |
| Message-ID | <mailman.512.1378148394.19984.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 9/2/2013 11:43 AM, Robert Kern wrote: > On 2013-09-02 16:06, Tommy Vee wrote: >> On 9/2/2013 5:55 AM, Robert Kern wrote: >>> On 2013-09-02 02:26, Tommy Vee wrote: >>>> Anyone know where I can get an easy to use Python class or algorithm >>>> for the >>>> Simplex optimization algorithm? I've tried the one in the link below, >>>> but I >>>> can't figure out if a) I'm using it properly, or b) where to get the >>>> solution. >>>> BTW, I tried some test scenarios using MS Excel's "Solver" and just >>>> can't get >>>> this algorithm to match Excel's results (which is spot on). >>>> >>>> http://taw9.hubpages.com/hub/Simplex-Algorithm-in-Python >>>> >>>> BTW, if I can't something to work, I'm going to be forced to use the >>>> VBA >>>> programmatic Excel interface. That wouldn't be too bad, but the data >>>> comes from >>>> a DB and getting it properly positioned to use Excel's "Solver" is very >>>> painful. A Python approach would be much cleaner. >>> >>> Can you show some of the test scenarios that you tried? There are >>> different conventions in how to represent a linear programming problem, >>> and different solvers may choose different conventions. You may have to >>> convert between representations. >>> >>> You may have better luck with the PuLP interface: >>> >>> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/PuLP >>> >>> PuLP itself is just a modelling language rather than a solver, but the >>> sources do contain compiled binaries for the CoinMP solver so it will >>> work out-of-box on popular platforms, like Windows. >>> >>> https://projects.coin-or.org/CoinMP >>> >> >> Thank you, I will definitely look at these and other options. BTW, >> try the test >> scenario in the link I sent. Very simple, only 3 variables. >> >> Maximize: 2x+3y+2z >> >> Constraints: 2x+y+z <=4, x+2y+z <=7, z <= 5 >> >> The algorithm displays the Tableau after each pivot, but where is the >> answer for >> x, y and z? > > You will have to read up on the Dantzig Simplex Algorithm to learn how > to read off the results from the final tableau. My understanding is that > you look at the columns representing the basic variables (in this case, > the second, third, and fourth columns represent x, y, and z, > respectively). If the column is all 0s except for a single 1, then the > row with the 1 has the variable's value in the rightmost column. If the > column has other values in it, then the variable's value is 0. > >> When I run this in Excel's Solver, I get x=0, y=3, z=1. which is >> indeed the >> maximized solution (11). > > The final tableau for this problem looks like this: > > [[ 1. 1. 0. 0. 1. 1. 0. 11.] > [ 0. 3. 0. 1. 2. -1. 0. 1.] > [ 0. -1. 1. 0. -1. 1. 0. 3.] > [ 0. -3. 0. 0. -2. 1. 1. 4.]] > > So, for x, we look in the second column and notice that it has a bunch > of different values in it, so x=0. > > For y, we look in the third column and see that it has its single 1 in > the third row. Looking all the way on the right for that row, we get a 3. > > For z, we look in the fourth column and see that it has its single 1 in > the second row. Looking all the way on the right for that row, we get a 1. > > So this solver does reproduce the result x=0, y=3, z=1. The maximized > solution is in the upper-rightmost element of the tableau, 11. > > Sound like a pain in the ass to code up that logic? It is. PuLP and > other industrial grade solver interfaces won't make you go through this. > You nailed it. Thanks for help. And you're right. This is too painful, I just read the PuLP doc and it may be a lot easier.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Simplex Algorithm Tommy Vee <xxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx> - 2013-09-01 21:26 -0400
Re: Simplex Algorithm Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-09-02 09:06 +0100
Re: Simplex Algorithm Tommy Vee <xxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx> - 2013-09-02 10:42 -0400
Re: Simplex Algorithm Tommy Vee <vitaletom1@gmail.com> - 2013-09-02 10:42 -0400
Re: Simplex Algorithm Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2013-09-02 10:45 +0100
Re: Simplex Algorithm Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2013-09-02 10:55 +0100
Re: Simplex Algorithm Tommy Vee <xxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx> - 2013-09-02 11:06 -0400
Re: Simplex Algorithm Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2013-09-02 16:43 +0100
Re: Simplex Algorithm Tommy Vee <xxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx> - 2013-09-02 14:59 -0400
Re: Simplex Algorithm Tommy Vee <vitaletom1@gmail.com> - 2013-09-02 14:59 -0400
Re: Simplex Algorithm Tommy Vee <vitaletom1@gmail.com> - 2013-09-02 11:06 -0400
Re: Simplex Algorithm Tony the Tiger <tony@tiger.invalid> - 2013-09-16 13:47 -0500
csiph-web