Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #19277
| Date | 2012-01-23 12:05 -0600 |
|---|---|
| From | Evan Driscoll <edriscoll@wisc.edu> |
| Subject | Re: while True or while 1 |
| References | <4F1AC1D4.2080402@gmail.com> <mailman.4909.1327157944.27778.python-list@python.org> <pL-dnUjq2eH3t4bSnZ2dnUVZ5vudnZ2d@giganews.com> <CAFYqXL8PPOi2dy7M0ae+zCVB2yD6hPDdr7q8MhL0waadqoWvuw@mail.gmail.com> <CALwzidm5NvdqCjrSTap2BE_mrgK9BjK7FEeGAM_cX=BDMKMrzQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4972.1327345569.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 01/23/2012 11:39 AM, Ian Kelly wrote: > "We should forget about small efficiencies, say about 97% of the time: > premature optimization is the root of all evil" > -- Donald Knuth To play devil's advocate for a moment, if you have the choice between two ways of writing something, A and B, where both are basically the same in terms of difficulty to write, difficulty to maintain, and difficulty to understand, but A is faster than B, even if just by a hair, why NOT write A? It's like 'iter++' vs '++iter' in a C++ for loop. For ints, or for some iterators with optimization, it makes no difference. But the latter will be faster in debug builds, and *might* be faster in release builds if you have a complicated iterator. So why NOT make for(...; ...; ++i) the typical way of writing a for loop? In the Python world, is 'while 1' any harder to understand than 'while True'? I'm about as staunch a supporter as you'll find for the idea that 'while 1' should throw an exception, and even *I* think that 'while 1' is about the least-offensive idiom out there. If 'while 1' throws you off, I'd hate to see what you do when you learn that Python accepts loops like 'while x' where the condition evaluates to true if x is a non-zero integer and false if x is 0. All that said, I like the 'while "stuff to do"' idea. Evan
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: while True or while 1 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-01-22 01:59 +1100
Re: while True or while 1 Erik Max Francis <max@alcyone.com> - 2012-01-21 13:13 -0800
Re: while True or while 1 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-01-22 09:13 +1100
Re: while True or while 1 Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-01-22 05:25 +0000
Re: while True or while 1 Dan Sommers <dan@tombstonezero.net> - 2012-01-22 16:05 +0000
Re: while True or while 1 alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-01-22 19:55 -0800
Re: while True or while 1 Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-01-23 08:02 -0500
Re: while True or while 1 Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@xemacs.org> - 2012-01-23 14:28 +0100
Re: while True or while 1 Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-01-23 13:33 -0500
Re: while True or while 1 MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-01-22 16:13 +0000
Re: while True or while 1 Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-23 15:51 +0000
Re: while True or while 1 Giampaolo Rodolà <g.rodola@gmail.com> - 2012-01-23 17:41 +0100
Re: while True or while 1 Erik Max Francis <max@alcyone.com> - 2012-01-23 11:12 -0800
Re: while True or while 1 Giampaolo Rodolà <g.rodola@gmail.com> - 2012-01-23 21:20 +0100
Re: while True or while 1 Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-01-23 10:39 -0700
Re: while True or while 1 Evan Driscoll <edriscoll@wisc.edu> - 2012-01-23 12:05 -0600
Re: while True or while 1 Andrea Crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2012-01-23 20:50 +0000
Re: while True or while 1 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-23 14:42 -0800
Re: while True or while 1 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-23 14:42 -0800
Re: while True or while 1 Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-01-24 03:37 +0000
csiph-web