Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #19142
| Date | 2012-01-20 11:13 +0100 |
|---|---|
| From | Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> |
| Subject | Re: verify the return value of a function |
| References | <CAOuJsM=DonsS_Th=XEx72z_5HjmdvdE4HOrJzmB4NuBt3fVSSw@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4876.1327054447.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Jabba Laci wrote: > Hi, > > In a unit test, I want to verify that a function returns a > cookielib.LWPCookieJar object. What is the correct way of doing that? > > 1) First I tried to figure out its type with type(return_value) but it > is <type 'instance'> > > 2) return_value.__class__ .__name__ gives 'LWPCookieJar', which is bettter > > 3) isinstance(return_value, cookielib.LWPCookieJar) seems to be the > best way, however somewhere I read that using isinstance is > discouraged > > Thanks, > > Laszlo > isinstance is fine, if you could find the source where it is discouraged... Could be a consequence of some specific context. However, checking types in OOP is in general a failure. Unitary tests are possibly an exception. JM
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: verify the return value of a function Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> - 2012-01-20 11:13 +0100
Re: verify the return value of a function Mel Wilson <mwilson@the-wire.com> - 2012-01-20 08:53 -0500
Re: verify the return value of a function Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-01-20 15:07 +0000
Re: verify the return value of a function Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-01-20 15:42 -0500
csiph-web