Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #16672
| From | Lawrence Velázquez <vq@larryv.me> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | Re: set -u not working as expected |
| Date | 2020-08-02 01:12 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.481.1596345182.2739.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | <000301d66834$588493c0$098dbb40$@kalvr.net> <F4821044-5F8D-4B6D-A266-BAC88AE3DC2C@larryv.me> <1867D8FC-85DD-4406-A239-3002913493AB@larryv.me> |
> On Aug 1, 2020, at 8:47 PM, Lawrence Velázquez <vq@larryv.me> wrote:
>
> Presumably none of these shells implements u+=(t) as u=("${u[@]}" t).
Granted, they do disagree on ${u[@]}.
% bash -c 'set -u; unset u; u=("${u[@]}" t); typeset -p u'
declare -a u=([0]="t")
% ksh -c 'set -u; unset u; u=("${u[@]}" t); typeset -p u'
typeset -a u=(t)
% zsh -c 'set -u; unset u; u=("${u[@]}" t); typeset -p u'
zsh:1: u[@]: parameter not set
> I haven't seen the code for arithmetic expansion, but I assume it
> treats v+=1 as morally equivalent to v=${v}+1 (à la C99). Thus there
> *is* an expansion, which fails under set -u. Regardless of the
> particulars, ksh and zsh again agree:
>
> % bash -c 'set -u; unset v; let v+=1; printf "<%s>\\n" "$v"'
> bash: v: unbound variable
> % ksh -c 'set -u; unset v; let v+=1; printf "<%s>\\n" "$v"'
> ksh: let: v: parameter not set
> ksh: v: parameter not set
> % zsh -c 'set -u; unset v; let v+=1; printf "<%s>\\n" "$v"'
> zsh:1: v: parameter not set
> zsh:1: v: parameter not set
On the other hand...
% bash -c 'set -u; typeset -i v; printf "<%s>\\n" "$v"'
bash: v: unbound variable
% ksh -c 'set -u; typeset -i v; printf "<%s>\\n" "$v"'
ksh: v: parameter not set
% zsh -c 'set -u; typeset -i v; printf "<%s>\\n" "$v"'
<0>
...and...
% bash -c 'set -u; typeset -i v; v+=1; printf "<%s>\\n" "$v"'
<1>
% ksh -c 'set -u; typeset -i v; v+=1; printf "<%s>\\n" "$v"'
<1>
% zsh -c 'set -u; typeset -i v; v+=1; printf "<%s>\\n" "$v"'
<1>
*shrug*
vq
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: set -u not working as expected Lawrence Velázquez <vq@larryv.me> - 2020-08-02 01:12 -0400
csiph-web