Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #87797
| References | <mei398$isr$1@ger.gmane.org> |
|---|---|
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Date | 2015-03-20 15:33 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: __iadd__ with 2 args? |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.48.1426887270.10327.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Neal Becker <ndbecker2@gmail.com> wrote: > I can write a member > > F.__iadd__ (self, *args) > > and then call it with 2 args: > > f = F() > f.__iadd__ (a, b) > > And then args is: > (a, b) > > But it seems impossible to spell this as > > f += a, b > > That, instead, results in > > args = ((a, b),) > > So should I just abandon the idea that += could be used this way? Is there some reason you need the *? Just have it take one argument which will be a tuple. >>> class F: ... def __iadd__(self, other): ... print(other) ... >>> f = F() >>> f += 1, 2 (1, 2)
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: __iadd__ with 2 args? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-20 15:33 -0600
csiph-web