Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #97508
| References | <tp5fec-l15.ln1@esprimo.zbmc.eu> <mv35a3$v1k$1@speranza.aioe.org> <pacb1b51ompc082r9378svm5eh9cvv2ekd@4ax.com> |
|---|---|
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Date | 2015-10-08 08:44 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Hiding code from intruders, a different slant on an old question |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.479.1444315530.28679.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 13:05:07 +0000 (UTC), alister > <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> declaimed the following: > > >>With a simple Cesar the method is "shift the alphabet by 'X' characters >>and X is the key >> >>if the key is unknown then the attacker still has to brute force the >>method (admittedly with only 25 options this is not difficult) > > But who'd consider that with just one-case and alphabet only... > > At the least include upper, lower, numbers, and basic punctuation -- > that will add a few more cycles of computation time to break <G> It doesn't really matter how much you add; any Caesar cipher is going to fall easily to just a little bit of frequency analysis. Consider an extreme case, where the range of X is the size of the entire Unicode character set. If the message is written in a Latin-based character set, chances are good that the majority of the characters will fall within a range of <96, giving the attacker a great starting point to brute-force from.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Hiding code from intruders, a different slant on an old question cl@isbd.net - 2015-10-07 10:38 +0100
Re: Hiding code from intruders, a different slant on an old question "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> - 2015-10-07 08:00 -0400
Re: Hiding code from intruders, a different slant on an old question alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2015-10-07 13:05 +0000
Re: Hiding code from intruders, a different slant on an old question Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-07 20:01 -0400
Re: Hiding code from intruders, a different slant on an old question cl@isbd.net - 2015-10-08 11:28 +0100
Re: Hiding code from intruders, a different slant on an old question Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 08:44 -0600
Re: Hiding code from intruders, a different slant on an old question alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2015-10-08 15:46 +0000
Re: Hiding code from intruders, a different slant on an old question Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 10:33 -0600
csiph-web