Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #7778
| References | <BANLkTinfUsHXuF5j5XjTMhiQXQKNi4ZSGA@mail.gmail.com> <4DF7E75E.9000907@mrabarnett.plus.com> |
|---|---|
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Date | 2011-06-16 17:57 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: break in a module |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.47.1308268695.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:57 PM, MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote: > To me, the obvious choice would be "return", not "break". No, "return" returns a value. Modules do not return values. Therefore "return" would be inappropriate. If this feature were deemed desirable, "break" would make more sense to me.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: break in a module Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 17:57 -0600
csiph-web