Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #49158
| Date | 2013-06-25 09:40 -0400 |
|---|---|
| From | Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> |
| Subject | Re: Loop Question |
| References | <2149a85e-e41b-46bf-a12d-7565789748a9@googlegroups.com> <afc4753e-d7b0-46b1-80d4-0e2fe8440871@googlegroups.com> <9e7940d2e7647db397ab662d33b06128@posteo.de> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3827.1372167656.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 06/24/2013 08:20 AM, Lutz Horn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 24.06.2013 14:12 schrieb christhecomic@gmail.com:
>> username=raw_input("Please enter your username: ")
>> password=raw_input("Please enter your password: ")
>> if username == "john doe" and password == "fopwpo":
>> print "Login Successful"
>> else:
>> print "Please try again"
>
> while not username or not password or username != "john doe" or password
> != "fopwpo":
> print "Please try again"
> username=raw_input("Please enter your username: ")
> password=raw_input("Please enter your password: ")
>
> print "Login Successful"
>
>
That requires you to have four raw_input() calls instead of two. And
what purpose does adding the two new clauses to the while test serve?
How is:
while not username or not password or username != "john doe" or password
!= "fopwpo":
different from:
while username != "john doe" or password != "fopwpo":
(other than taking more time and space, and being harder to read) ?
--
DaveA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Loop Question christhecomic@gmail.com - 2013-06-23 16:18 -0700
Re: Loop Question rurpy@yahoo.com - 2013-06-23 16:49 -0700
Re: Loop Question christhecomic@gmail.com - 2013-06-23 20:24 -0700
Re: Loop Question Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-06-24 00:23 +0000
Re: Loop Question christhecomic@gmail.com - 2013-06-24 05:12 -0700
Re: Loop Question rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-06-24 07:03 -0700
Re: Loop Question Lutz Horn <lutz.horn@posteo.de> - 2013-06-24 14:20 +0200
Re: Loop Question Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-06-25 09:40 -0400
Re: Loop Question christhecomic@gmail.com - 2013-06-24 11:23 -0700
Re: Loop Question John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2013-06-24 18:42 +0000
Re: Loop Question Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick <kwpolska@gmail.com> - 2013-06-24 20:53 +0200
Re: Loop Question John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2013-06-24 19:00 +0000
Re: Loop Question Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-06-24 15:23 -0400
csiph-web