Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #90340
| References | <mailman.49.1430633046.12865.python-list@python.org> <66312d54-de5a-4015-99b5-41d332559e00@googlegroups.com> <CALwzidmXZmK8V=B7jPQaqBvRLOhvGEj1-ZnWcLvngjzh5KuWjQ@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Date | 2015-05-10 21:36 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: code blocks |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.341.1431315447.12865.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 7:39 PM, zipher <dreamingforward@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Similarly, you'd want:
>>
>>>>> encode(codestr)
>>
>> to instantiate all objects in the codestr. You can't do this with eval, because it doesn't allow assignment (eval(n=2) returns "InvalidSyntax").
>
> Is exec what you're looking for?
>
>>>> exec('n = 2')
>>>> print(n)
> 2
I just found that eval can be used to evaluate a code object compiled
in the 'exec' mode:
>>> eval(compile('n = 42', '', 'exec'))
>>> n
42
Interesting. But I suppose that the mode is really just a compilation
option and there's not really much distinction as far as eval is
concerned once they've been compiled.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
code blocks "Dr. John Q. Hacker" <zondervanz@gmail.com> - 2015-05-02 13:30 -0500
Re: code blocks Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-05-03 11:56 +0100
Re: code blocks zipher <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2015-05-10 18:39 -0700
Re: code blocks Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-05-10 21:31 -0600
Re: code blocks Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2015-05-10 20:40 -0700
Re: code blocks zipher <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2015-05-11 08:22 -0700
Re: code blocks zipher <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2015-05-11 08:23 -0700
Re: code blocks Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-05-12 01:40 +1000
Re: code blocks Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-05-11 18:01 +0200
Re: code blocks Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-05-12 02:07 +1000
Re: code blocks zipher <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2015-05-11 09:51 -0700
Re: code blocks Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-05-11 18:59 +0200
Re: code blocks Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-05-10 21:36 -0600
csiph-web