Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #16535
| References | (2 earlier) <4ed818bb$0$29988$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.3211.1322791680.27778.python-list@python.org> <4ed86358$0$29988$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.3219.1322805724.27778.python-list@python.org> <4ed8923f$0$29988$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-12-02 20:16 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Clever hack or code abomination? |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3220.1322817418.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote: > Dude, it was deliberately obfuscated code. I even named the function > "obfuscated_prefixes". I thought that would have been a hint <wink> > > It's kinda scary that of all the sins against readability committed in my > function, including isinstance(type(c), type(type)) which I was > particularly proud of, the only criticism you came up with was that > chr(45) is hard to read. I'm impressed <grins like a mad thing> Heh! I know it was obfuscated, and that's why I didn't bother mentioning the obvious. > And besides, given how rare such byte-manipulations on ASCII characters > are in Python, it would be a shame to lose the ability to use '' and "" > for strings just to avoid calling ord and chr functions. Agreed. That flexibility is a _huge_ advantage. Definitely not worth changing anything. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Clever hack or code abomination? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2011-11-30 22:15 -0500
Re: Clever hack or code abomination? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-01 03:38 +0000
Re: Clever hack or code abomination? Matt Joiner <anacrolix@gmail.com> - 2011-12-01 14:49 +1100
Re: Clever hack or code abomination? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-01 19:21 +1100
Re: Clever hack or code abomination? John Ladasky <ladasky@my-deja.com> - 2011-12-06 11:19 -0800
Re: Clever hack or code abomination? Arnaud Delobelle <arnodel@gmail.com> - 2011-12-01 08:35 +0000
Re: Clever hack or code abomination? Vito 'ZeD' De Tullio <zak.mc.kraken@libero.it> - 2011-12-01 21:35 +0100
Re: Clever hack or code abomination? "Martin P. Hellwig" <martin.hellwig@gmail.com> - 2011-12-01 21:13 +0000
Re: Clever hack or code abomination? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-02 00:15 +0000
Re: Clever hack or code abomination? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-02 13:07 +1100
Re: Clever hack or code abomination? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-02 05:34 +0000
Re: Clever hack or code abomination? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-02 17:02 +1100
Re: Clever hack or code abomination? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-02 08:54 +0000
Re: Clever hack or code abomination? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-02 20:16 +1100
Re: Clever hack or code abomination? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-12-01 21:49 -0500
Re: Clever hack or code abomination? Matt Joiner <anacrolix@gmail.com> - 2011-12-02 16:11 +1100
Re: Clever hack or code abomination? Chris Hulan <chris.hulan@gmail.com> - 2011-12-02 09:20 -0800
csiph-web